|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pwning at a lower limit
So Zen and I were talking poker and talking smack, like we do all day everyday, and he comes out with the following statement:
"I bet I can make more money than you playing a level lower." Oh no you din'nt. So we hashed out the details. We chose the $33's vs. the $55's because those two are closest in value, and the chip stack discrepancy makes it a little interesting. I'm going to play 500 $55's and he's going to play 500 $33's this month. Whomever makes the most money wins the bet. I will not disclose the amount for which we are gambling, because if his wife (holding new baby) read this and found out how much cash he was pissing away on stupid prop bets, she'd flip out. It'll probably take us a month. There is no point to this whatsoever. Irieguy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pwning at a lower limit
Oh well, I'll be going up to the $30s in a day or two. I'll just have to beat him several times.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pwning at a lower limit
what if she read this?
[ QUOTE ] I will not disclose the amount for which we are gambling, because if his wife (holding new baby) read this and found out how much cash he was pissing away on stupid prop bets, she'd flip out. [/ QUOTE ] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pwning at a lower limit
How are 33 and 55 closer than 22 and 33? Regardless, I agree that the different chip counts make this interesting.
PS -- Can I get in on this and play at the 6s? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pwning at a lower limit
[ QUOTE ]
How are 33 and 55 closer than 22 and 33? [/ QUOTE ] As a percentage increase, the jump to the $55's is the smallest. Irieguy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pwning at a lower limit
Im confused, someone help me |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pwning at a lower limit
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How are 33 and 55 closer than 22 and 33? [/ QUOTE ] As a percentage increase, the jump to the $55's is the smallest. Irieguy [/ QUOTE ] Jump from 22 to 33 = 50% increase. Jump from 33 to 55 = 66.6% increase. 22 and 33 are closer. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pwning at a lower limit
Ok thats the help I needed [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I suspect that he's talking about something else, or maybe slyly referring to the fact that $33s run shorter and thus are closer in terms of $ wagered per hour.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pwning at a lower limit
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] How are 33 and 55 closer than 22 and 33? [/ QUOTE ] As a percentage increase, the jump to the $55's is the smallest. Irieguy [/ QUOTE ] Jump from 22 to 33 = 50% increase. Jump from 33 to 55 = 66.6% increase. 22 and 33 are closer. [/ QUOTE ] This ought to be interesting [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pwning at a lower limit
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] How are 33 and 55 closer than 22 and 33? [/ QUOTE ] As a percentage increase, the jump to the $55's is the smallest. Irieguy [/ QUOTE ] Jump from 22 to 33 = 50% increase. Jump from 33 to 55 = 66.6% increase. 22 and 33 are closer. [/ QUOTE ] Holy christ, guys. The $22's did not occur to us. Sorry. It's the smallest jump of all the limits we've played. Irieguy |
|
|