Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 07-15-2005, 05:58 PM
Mr_Gordon Mr_Gordon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 113
Default Re: Would you take Matusow at 8-3? *DELETED*

Post deleted by Mr_Gordon
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 07-15-2005, 06:01 PM
TomHimself TomHimself is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 299
Default Re: Would you take Matusow at 8-3?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
and i agree with Greg Raymer. Matusow winning would be bad for poker.

[/ QUOTE ]
Where did Raymer say this? I doubt he did. Would love to see a link or something to back up this statement.

[/ QUOTE ]he said it like a hour ago on 2+2. search for his most recent post
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 07-15-2005, 06:04 PM
Boltsfan1992 Boltsfan1992 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 42
Default Re: Would you take Matusow at 8-3?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
and i agree with Greg Raymer. Matusow winning would be bad for poker.

[/ QUOTE ]
Where did Raymer say this? I doubt he did. Would love to see a link or something to back up this statement.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you haven't read it yet, but he gives his thoughts on the thread or two below this one. "Thanks again for your support" I think is the title of it.

BTW, Mike would not make a good representative for this game, and I don't think Mike wants to give anything back. My impression of the guy is that he thinks of himself only and doesn't pick his acquaintances very well...

I'm in full agreement with Greg on this one. I seem to experience a trashtalker every week now. I still keep the chat on...it's a fun read.

PB
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 07-15-2005, 06:06 PM
Mr_Gordon Mr_Gordon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 113
Default Re: Would you take Matusow at 8-3?

Ya sorry guys, I'm a donk for not seeing his post.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 07-15-2005, 06:15 PM
sketchy1 sketchy1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7
Default live hand for hand updates

There's some audio broadcasts but listening to poker is about as interesting as watching grass grow.

Hand for hand updates via pokertrails.com
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 07-15-2005, 06:19 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: live hand for hand updates

Well they do have Hellmuth. Won't be too boring [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 07-15-2005, 06:26 PM
duma duma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The OC
Posts: 213
Default Re: Would you take Matusow at 8-3?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
and i agree with Greg Raymer. Matusow winning would be bad for poker.

[/ QUOTE ]
Where did Raymer say this? I doubt he did. Would love to see a link or something to back up this statement.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you haven't read it yet, but he gives his thoughts on the thread or two below this one. "Thanks again for your support" I think is the title of it.

BTW, Mike would not make a good representative for this game, and I don't think Mike wants to give anything back. My impression of the guy is that he thinks of himself only and doesn't pick his acquaintances very well...

I'm in full agreement with Greg on this one. I seem to experience a trashtalker every week now. I still keep the chat on...it's a fun read.

PB

[/ QUOTE ]

if you have Comcast On Demand cable you might be able to see some "interesting" poker shows on there. they are from the Players Network. its kinda funny that there is a ton of gambling related content on there.

anyways, there are ON Demand shows for poker and the one that is currently on there features Matusow, Sklansky, and Todd Brunson talking about Omaha Hi-Lo. you can tell that Sklansky doesnt want to be there. Matusow is constantly talking and stepping over everyone and Sklansky just has this look on his face that is priceless. All 2+2'ers should check this out.

Comcast digital cable. go to On Demand, then Lifestyle, then Gambling, then Poker.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 07-15-2005, 06:43 PM
cwsiggy cwsiggy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 348
Default Re: live hand for hand updates

The Gutshot interface of the virtual table looks pretty good. They are currently doing some test hands. link - you may need to register for that link to work!

http://www.gutshotbank.com/gutshot/f....jsp?auth=true
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 07-15-2005, 06:46 PM
goofball goofball is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 43
Default Re: WSOP Final Table: \"Official\" News, Results, and Discussion

[ QUOTE ]
The two remaining from PokerStars:

Daniel "Berka" Bergsdorf
Brad "Bogey54" Kondracki

From Bluesquare.com here's the Final Table Odds:

Black 9-2
Barch 5-1
Kanter 5-1
Matusow 11-2
Hachem 6-1
Bergsdorf 7-1
Dannenmann 7-1
Lazar 10-1
Kondracki 16-1

Kevin...

[/ QUOTE ]

Mathematically it looks like Kanter is the best bet, and Kondracki is by far the worst.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 07-15-2005, 06:48 PM
BlackRain BlackRain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 241
Default Re: live hand for hand updates

[ QUOTE ]
The Gutshot interface of the virtual table looks pretty good. They are currently doing some test hands. link - you may need to register for that link to work!

http://www.gutshotbank.com/gutshot/f....jsp?auth=true

[/ QUOTE ]

I just see a gray screen. Are they still testing?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.