Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-01-2005, 03:45 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: Time to gamble?

Look at how quickly the GoCee numbers for 66 drop off as compared to QJs. Sure it's better against one opponent but we can ignore that as the BB will play.

Opp: 66: QJs:
1 63.3 60.3
2 43.2 44.1
3 31.5 35.6
4 24.5 30.1
5 20.1 26.1
6 17.3 23.0
7 15.4 20.7
8 14.0 18.7
9 13.1 17.1
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-01-2005, 03:50 PM
chok1 chok1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1
Default Re: Time to gamble?

I think any hand you go all in with is asking to be called. When your all in is only the Minimum bet, I find that I usually get called by more the one person and they check it through hoping to just knock me out so they are closer to the money. In that case 67s would be much better than 66. You also had 4 more chances to get a better hand. Going all in with 66, to me, is the same as getting blinded out. You know it might be multiway and all you have is a decent heads up hand. Should've waited.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-01-2005, 03:56 PM
gcDanno gcDanno is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26
Default Results........

I agreed that it was time to play the hand. I figured any hand I play, I'm probably going to be playing multi-handed anyway so I decided to call (after the ante, i had less than the 4k blinds). Also, what are the odds that on this kind of bubble, that people are going to play anything until I'm gone anyway? Boy was I wrong!

The results of the hand absolutely do not change my mind that I should have played this hand or not, and this is not a bad beat story! I was way behind when I put my money in.

I have posted the entire game log, because you just don't see this type of hand come along that often. As it turns out, if I fold, I win the $650 this hand! Ain't Poker fun!

PokerStars Game #1809546107: Tournament #8377541, Hold'em No Limit - Level XIV (2000/4000) - 2005/06/01 - 03:11:54 (ET)
Table '8377541 34' Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: bib1 (28754 in chips)
Seat 2: Joe_Russo (66292 in chips)
Seat 3: tjassaa (25200 in chips)
Seat 4: ripdog71 (21020 in chips)
Seat 5: LAJG (118393 in chips)
Seat 7: Badass2635 (61576 in chips)
Seat 8: nupsee (59286 in chips)
Seat 9: gcDanno (4150 in chips)
bib1: posts the ante 200
Joe_Russo: posts the ante 200
tjassaa: posts the ante 200
ripdog71: posts the ante 200
LAJG: posts the ante 200
Badass2635: posts the ante 200
nupsee: posts the ante 200
gcDanno: posts the ante 200
tjassaa: posts small blind 2000
ripdog71: posts big blind 4000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to gcDanno [6s 6c]
LAJG: folds
Badass2635: folds
nupsee: calls 4000
gcDanno: calls 3950 and is all-in
bib1: raises 24554 to 28554 and is all-in
Joe_Russo: raises 37538 to 66092 and is all-in
tjassaa: folds
ripdog71: folds
nupsee: calls 55086 and is all-in
*** FLOP *** [6h Ts 2d]
*** TURN *** [6h Ts 2d] [Th]
*** RIVER *** [6h Ts 2d Th] [Qc]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
nupsee: shows [Ad Ac] (two pair, Aces and Tens)
Joe_Russo: shows [Qd Qs] (a full house, Queens full of Tens)
Joe_Russo collected 61064 from side pot-2
bib1: shows [9s 9c] (two pair, Tens and Nines)
Joe_Russo collected 73862 from side pot-1
gcDanno: shows [6s 6c] (a full house, Sixes full of Tens)
Joe_Russo collected 23350 from main pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 158276 Main pot 23350. Side pot-1 73862. Side pot-2 61064. | Rake 0
Board [6h Ts 2d Th Qc]
Seat 1: bib1 showed [9s 9c] and lost with two pair, Tens and Nines
Seat 2: Joe_Russo (button) showed [Qd Qs] and won (158276) with a full house, Queens full of Tens
Seat 3: tjassaa (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: ripdog71 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: LAJG folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: Badass2635 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: nupsee showed [Ad Ac] and lost with two pair, Aces and Tens
Seat 9: gcDanno showed [6s 6c] and lost with a full house, Sixes full of Tens
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-01-2005, 03:58 PM
z32fanatic z32fanatic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: Time to gamble?

I would call/push and here's why. The CO is short stacked and may push a hand like KJo with a limper in front hoping to get it heads up with you. Also, the SB might not even complete because he is short stacked. If the CO folds, the only the button can limp, and he may have trash. Best case scenario is the CO pushes and MP1 folds and you get it heads up against him. Worst case scenario is the button limps and it's probably 4 way. I say push.

Edit: Now I see your post. I thought the CO would push, but obviously you were done in this hand. I think you played it right though.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-01-2005, 03:59 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: Results........

That was the other thing in my mind - late in a rebuy tourney you will probably be against aggressive players, so a limp is suspect. I really think it's better to wait for a multiway hand than to call allin with 66.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-01-2005, 05:09 PM
blockafor blockafor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 18
Default Re: Results........

This is very close to the bubble so aggression will be lower than usual.

I'd play this hand here and hope that its just utg+1, you, and the BB. If you get many overcalls, there's a good chance a big stack raises to steal the dead money, which would limit the field and increase your chances of winning the pot.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-01-2005, 05:21 PM
jimotto jimotto is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 12
Default So how did that work out in the final standings?

When the three of you bust out on the same hand, does order of finish go by hand rank or by initial stack size?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-01-2005, 05:30 PM
gcDanno gcDanno is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: So how did that work out in the final standings?

Initial stack size :-(
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-01-2005, 06:43 PM
JaBlue JaBlue is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 195
Default Re: Time to gamble?

hero calls.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-01-2005, 06:45 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: Time to gamble?

[ QUOTE ]
hero calls.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow great reasoning there.

No one has yet addressed my argument about how 66 is a bad hand multiway - I really think this is a fold. That coupled with the fact that a late game EP limper can often mean a big pot which might get you into the money.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.