Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Do you
Check 8 34.78%
Bet <66% of pot 11 47.83%
Bet >66% of pot 4 17.39%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-17-2005, 03:11 PM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 18
Default Re: Open Raise (Definitive Poll)

[ QUOTE ]
it would be great to pool our results with these hands to see howw profitable they arent.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a good idea, but if we do this, I think that we need to mention what levels we play.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-17-2005, 03:13 PM
Danenania Danenania is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 13
Default Re: Open Raise (Definitive Poll)

I raise all but KTo, A9o, T9s, 55, and 44 at least 90%. T9s probably 75%. KTo, A9o, and 55 maybe 25%. 44 never.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-17-2005, 03:15 PM
surfdoc surfdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 140
Default Re: Open Raise (Definitive Poll)

[ QUOTE ]
it would be great to pool our results with these hands to see howw profitable they arent.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is a good idea. The only problem is we would have to seperate out those players who routinely raise a hand like KTo utg from the rest who only raise this hand situationally to get any meaningful data.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-17-2005, 03:15 PM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 268
Default Re: Open Raise (Definitive Poll)

youre one of these guys who values QJo more than KTo?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-17-2005, 03:16 PM
wdeadwyler wdeadwyler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 172
Default Folding pairs shorthanded

Why would you fold a pair like 44 shorthanded UTG instead of limping. Is it really -EV to limp call a raise to flop a set?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-17-2005, 03:17 PM
antifish225 antifish225 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 124
Default Re: Open Raise (Definitive Poll)

Maybe it is just me, however in my PT database I am showing a profit with 33 and higher raising from UTG (over 100K hands 5/10) - anyone else still raising with these small pairs out of position with sucsess?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-17-2005, 03:18 PM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 268
Default Re: Open Raise (Definitive Poll)

sample size = too small
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-17-2005, 03:18 PM
Victor Victor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cleveland
Posts: 68
Default Re: Folding pairs shorthanded

do you coldcall raises with 44?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-17-2005, 03:18 PM
krishanleong krishanleong is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 45
Default Re: Folding pairs shorthanded

[ QUOTE ]
Why would you fold a pair like 44 shorthanded UTG instead of limping. Is it really -EV to limp call a raise to flop a set?

[/ QUOTE ]

It seems most people think so (me included).

Krishan
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-17-2005, 03:18 PM
brazilio brazilio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,082
Default Re: Folding pairs shorthanded

[ QUOTE ]
Why would you fold a pair like 44 shorthanded UTG instead of limping. Is it really -EV to limp call a raise to flop a set?

[/ QUOTE ]

no, it's -EV to limp, get iso/value raised, have the blinds fold, and have to fold 44 on an A79 board when he's got KQ.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.