#1
|
|||
|
|||
QQ cr\'ed allin on flop
Party 2/4, no reads.
Hero dealt black QQ in bb. 3 limpers, sb completes, hero raises to $25, limpers fold and sb calls. sb has $300, hero covers. flop 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]10 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (~$60 pot) sb checks, hero bets $50, sb goes all-in (about $225 more), hero? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ cr\'ed allin on flop
Foldage.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ cr\'ed allin on flop
I call typically.
I think you see draws more than sets here. although given that sets have us much more dominated than we have draws, how muh more often wee need to see draws debatable. edit : didn't see the big preflop raise. hmm its a bit closer as I'm not sure SB calls preflop with suited connector there. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ cr\'ed allin on flop
amoeba your logic contains a common fallacy
over all the deals that we see draws and sets we are -EV to call |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ cr\'ed allin on flop
[ QUOTE ]
amoeba your logic contains a common fallacy over all the deals that we see draws and sets we are -EV to call [/ QUOTE ] come again? are you saying there is no semibluff frequency that makes calling +ev? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ cr\'ed allin on flop
Look at your watch, if the seconds hand is between the 45 and the 60, call. Otherwise fold.
|
|
|