|
|
|
|
#1
12-27-2005, 12:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KJo - what do you think of this line?
You make it sound like getting raised by CO would be a good thing. That would suck.
Also, you say we bet so KT dosn't check through, but then you say KT is value raising if we bet. 
|
|
#2
12-27-2005, 01:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KJo - what do you think of this line?
[ QUOTE ]
You make it sound like getting raised by CO would be a good thing. That would suck. Also, you say we bet so KT dosn't check through, but then you say KT is value raising if we bet. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this. Also, if CO raises the river I'm never calling.
|
|
#3
12-27-2005, 07:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KJo - what do you think of this line?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You make it sound like getting raised by CO would be a good thing. That would suck. Also, you say we bet so KT dosn't check through, but then you say KT is value raising if we bet. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this. Also, if CO raises the river I'm never calling. [/ QUOTE ] No, I'm not saying it would be a good thing. Just that if MP folds and CO raises it is an easier fold. If MP calls CO might raise a more marginal hand with a bad player caught between. Re-reading it this morning(after some much needed sleep)I realize how hard it would be for CO to raise KT/KJ even KQ would find it hard to raise against another player who isn't a donkaholic. Just make sure CO doesn't view you as such before you bet/fold.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
