Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-19-2005, 10:58 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sthief09: im kinda drunk from the nyquil
Posts: 1,562
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
Also, there are several people that are claiming I don't know what I'm talking about when I say the Rebel Flag isn't about slavery.

Apparently they are offended by images like this:

[/ QUOTE ]
One of the people wacki is talking about is me.

Wacki, that flag doesn't offend me. People using the word [censored] doesn't offend me. There's not a whole lot in the world that offends me. You're completely off base here in assuming that my position ont eh flag has anything to do with personal emotiona pertaining to it.

[ QUOTE ]
state legislature records from that time only talks about state rights, heritage, etc.

[/ QUOTE ]
Good call, since governments never lie. I used to really like your posts, but this whole flag issue has really shown me that you have no idea what you're talking about.

To rebut your certain reply, no it's not because you disagree with me. GutOnTilt has also disagreed with much of what I've said regarding the flag and we are still good friends. You have no opinion of your own. Everything you write is googled bs and it's pathetic.


Edit to note that I am VERY against bannign people for rebel flags, swastikas, ghost bumping, stupid polls and pretty much all the [censored] people get banned for each day.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-19-2005, 10:58 PM
TheRover TheRover is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 86
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

[ QUOTE ]
There are people at 2+2 argueing that anyone using this symbol:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cactuar


is a racist.


[/ QUOTE ]

That's so [censored] hilarious. Both the picture and the text.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-19-2005, 11:00 PM
ddubois ddubois is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 97
Default Re: So I guess some people think symbols/posters should be banned.

[ QUOTE ]
Also, I don't see how the confederate flag represents slavery. The civil war was about states' rights, not slavery. Slavery was a side issue.

[/ QUOTE ]
I personally think this is BS. The claim that the war was about "states rights" is a bit of semantic munging to make the southern states sound slightly more noble than they actually were, perhaps as a means of mending fences between the two halves of the country.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-19-2005, 11:02 PM
tonypaladino tonypaladino is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: props to Stuey for fixing my avatar
Posts: 498
Default Re: So I guess some people think symbols/posters should be banned.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, I don't see how the confederate flag represents slavery. The civil war was about states' rights, not slavery. Slavery was a side issue.

[/ QUOTE ]
I personally think this is BS. The claim that the war was about "states rights" is a bit of semantic munging to make the southern states sound slightly more noble than they actually were, perhaps as a means of mending fences between the two halves of the country.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do your personal thoughts have any basis in fact?
Maybe you should read about the civil war and not rely on what you learned in 10th grade history class.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-19-2005, 11:02 PM
wacki wacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 109
Default Re: So I guess some people think symbols/posters should be banned.

[ QUOTE ]
I thought the point was to get all the monkeys flinging dung.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I don't want to have a dung fest. I made a mistake by emotionally charging the thread but I'm running off of very very little sleep and I'm engaged in a rather stupid debate.

Basically, the arguement is that anyone that uses that flag is a racist hiding under the cover of heritage. That includes the states of Mississippi, Florida, Arkansas, Georgia, and I would assume Dollywood.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-19-2005, 11:03 PM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 983
Default Re: Controversy over symbols and racism .

whats the problem with the flag then?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-19-2005, 11:04 PM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: So I guess some people think symbols/posters should be banned.

All slave owners were against slavery, dincha know?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-19-2005, 11:05 PM
wacki wacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 109
Default Re: So I guess some people think symbols/posters should be banned.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm looking to apply for a mod job to keep this forum as white as my baby's bottom. PM me wacki if you need extra help.

[/ QUOTE ]

Lets keep the mods out of this. I highly highly doubt mat will allow people to get banned for this stuff. Most of the people argueing this aren't even for banning. They just think anyone that sports a rebel flag is an inbred redneck racist.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-19-2005, 11:05 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sthief09: im kinda drunk from the nyquil
Posts: 1,562
Default Re: So I guess some people think symbols/posters should be banned.

[ QUOTE ]
I made a mistake by emotionally charging the thread

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, you did.


[ QUOTE ]
but I'm running off of very very little sleep and I'm engaged in a rather stupid debate.

[/ QUOTE ]
No one asked you to make this thread. You fvcked up, just admit it.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-19-2005, 11:05 PM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 983
Default Re: So I guess some people think symbols/posters should be banned.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, I don't see how the confederate flag represents slavery. The civil war was about states' rights, not slavery. Slavery was a side issue.

[/ QUOTE ]
I personally think this is BS. The claim that the war was about "states rights" is a bit of semantic munging to make the southern states sound slightly more noble than they actually were, perhaps as a means of mending fences between the two halves of the country.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do your personal thoughts have any basis in fact?
Maybe you should read about the civil war and not rely on what you learned in 10th grade history class.

[/ QUOTE ]I think you may have missed his point somewhat.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.