Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:28 PM
ALL1N ALL1N is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 156
Default Re: Small blind epiphany.

[ QUOTE ]
Why shouldn't I cold-call here?

[/ QUOTE ]

Who said you shouldn't?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:28 PM
NLSoldier NLSoldier is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 91
Default Re: Small blind epiphany.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why shouldn't I cold-call here?

[/ QUOTE ]

Who said you shouldn't?

[/ QUOTE ]

everyone who says its never correct to cold call a steal raise in the small blind. IIRC mason is in this camp.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-04-2005, 01:28 AM
ALL1N ALL1N is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 156
Default Re: Small blind epiphany.

Never cold-call?? EVER?? There are many situations where coldcalling is wayy better than either other option. For a start, all of the times when you're going to have to hit a pair to win, yet your hand is too good to fold. There's also more.

I reckon that never coldcalling in the SB is leaving a fair amount of money on the table, especially in more aggressive higher stakes games.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-04-2005, 01:31 AM
NLSoldier NLSoldier is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 91
Default Re: Small blind epiphany.

[ QUOTE ]
Never cold-call?? EVER?? There are many situations where coldcalling is wayy better than either other option. For a start, all of the times when you're going to have to hit a pair to win, yet your hand is too good to fold. There's also more.

I reckon that never coldcalling in the SB is leaving a fair amount of money on the table, especially in more aggressive higher stakes games.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think thats what I remember Mason saying when I had lunch with him [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] But I guess I could be misquoting him. I doubt he will come in here to correct me...btw this is strictly talking about when we are against a button steal raise.

anyways, I dont find myself cold calling a button steal raise very often at all. I am more willing to cold call if the raise comes from the CO or HJ though.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-04-2005, 01:34 AM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: Small blind epiphany.

[ QUOTE ]
1/2 Blind Structure

Preflop: Jeff is SB with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">5 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises</font>.

Button 20/11/1.6 (Full ring stats)
BB 54/0/.5 (Ditto)

Why shouldn't I cold-call here?

[/ QUOTE ]

in this situation i think i cold call 100%. but i could be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-04-2005, 01:42 AM
ALL1N ALL1N is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 156
Default Re: Small blind epiphany.

[ QUOTE ]
anyways, I dont find myself cold calling a button steal raise very often at all. I am more willing to cold call if the raise comes from the CO or HJ though.

[/ QUOTE ]

What about if you hold T9s here? And the button knows you 3-bet light here (say you 3-bet with JTo here last lap and showed it down). I dunno how Mason could possibly argue for anything but coldcalling then.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-04-2005, 02:33 AM
aslowjoe aslowjoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 36
Default Re: Small blind epiphany.

[ QUOTE ]
equity (%)
32% { K6s }
41% { 22+, A2s+, K6s+, Q7s+, J7s+, T7s+, 97s+, 87s, A2o+, K9o+, Q9o+, J9o+, T9o }
27% { random }


[/ QUOTE ]

Please explain why this hand shouldn't go in the muck. Your 32% pot equity whith rake is a loss. Your out of postion, your likely dominated so your are likely to lose more when behind and win less when your ahead. And what about the times BB really does have a hand and you are 3bet.

Besides this hand which I couldn't call without more info as to why this has really got me thinking when is it okay
to CC on a steal raise. Given this same situation what else would you CC.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-10-2005, 09:18 AM
brazilio brazilio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,082
Default Re: Small blind epiphany.

Isn't steal percentage rather than pfr going to be more important in situations like this? I coldcall here sometimes, but certainly not 100%.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-10-2005, 09:30 AM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: Small blind epiphany.

[ QUOTE ]
1/2 Blind Structure

Preflop: Jeff is SB with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">5 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises</font>.

Button 20/11/1.6 (Full ring stats)
BB 54/0/.5 (Ditto)

Why shouldn't I cold-call here?

[/ QUOTE ]

shouldn't this be an easy fold without some serious metagame considerations? (e.g. it is 3-handed and you have been folding, or have been showing down some serious winners)

I thought we didn't want to go up against good players with marginal hands when we're out of position, I think I might be missing something
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-10-2005, 09:39 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Small blind epiphany.

This is a pretty clear raise/fold situation to me with the default being to fold. The decision is based on button's steal and WTSD%.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.