|
|
|
|
#2
11-07-2005, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Agression Check
[ QUOTE ]
I would probably call the 3-bet on the river. [/ QUOTE ] I don't get it. Do we really think SB is 3-betting OOP with the 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] or exactly J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]? 
|
|
#4
11-07-2005, 07:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Agression Check
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would probably call the 3-bet on the river. [/ QUOTE ] I don't get it. Do we really think SB is 3-betting OOP with the 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] or exactly J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, 66 is very likely. Considering the turn and river action and the fact that he is a TAG I can't see how we are ahead when he makes it 3 bets on the river. What would you put him on when he does that?
|
|
#5
11-07-2005, 07:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Agression Check
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I would probably call the 3-bet on the river. [/ QUOTE ] I don't get it. Do we really think SB is 3-betting OOP with the 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] or exactly J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, 66 is very likely. Considering the turn and river action and the fact that he is a TAG I can't see how we are ahead when he makes it 3 bets on the river. What would you put him on when he does that? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I guess you're right. I suppose I don't get into too many hands like this with decent players. Invariably it seems, villain has KsQs and can't believe that his flopped monster is now worthless. I guess I'm not 3-betting 66 out of the SB vs an EP raise either... but I suppose that's a different thread altogther. Tom
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
