|
|
|
|
#1
11-30-2005, 12:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If anything needs to be split, its NL/PL 6max and NL/PL full. [/ QUOTE ] TRUTH....TRUUUUUUUUUUTH. [/ QUOTE ] I think this is a bad way to split the forum. So you are implying that NL25 6-max and NL400 6-max are more similar than NL400 full vs NL400 6-max? 
|
|
#2
11-30-2005, 12:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If anything needs to be split, its NL/PL 6max and NL/PL full. [/ QUOTE ] TRUTH....TRUUUUUUUUUUTH. [/ QUOTE ] I think this is a bad way to split the forum. So you are implying that NL25 6-max and NL400 6-max are more similar than NL400 full vs NL400 6-max? [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, then you are getting into the same problem they had with the limit short hand forum that is now split. I think the splt should pertain mostly to the SSNL forum as ghazban mentioned
|
|
#3
11-30-2005, 12:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If anything needs to be split, its NL/PL 6max and NL/PL full. [/ QUOTE ] TRUTH....TRUUUUUUUUUUTH. [/ QUOTE ] I think this is a bad way to split the forum. So you are implying that NL25 6-max and NL400 6-max are more similar than NL400 full vs NL400 6-max? [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#4
11-30-2005, 12:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If anything needs to be split, its NL/PL 6max and NL/PL full. [/ QUOTE ] TRUTH....TRUUUUUUUUUUTH. [/ QUOTE ] I think this is a bad way to split the forum. So you are implying that NL25 6-max and NL400 6-max are more similar than NL400 full vs NL400 6-max? [/ QUOTE ] Nope. I'm saying that I like the forum how it is and offerring a dumber split in the hopes of confusing the argument. <wink>
|
|
#6
11-30-2005, 04:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[i]If you split the forums, SSNL would lose a lot of good advice.
-Poker Fink Why, there are plenty of good 100max players, and I bet the likes of Xorbie and TWP would still reply to interesting posts. I think it needs to be done. 25-100nl is very different than 200-1000nl
|
|
#7
11-30-2005, 07:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
[i]If you split the forums, SSNL would lose a lot of good advice. -Poker Fink Why, there are plenty of good 100max players, and I bet the likes of Xorbie and TWP would still reply to interesting posts. I think it needs to be done. 25-100nl is very different than 200-1000nl [/ QUOTE ] Its not like small stakes players won't be able to read the mid stakes forum if they want to. I have been playing small stakes for quite a while and am presently in transition to mid stakes. I have been reading the mid high forum almost exclusively for several months now. I think the small stakes forum is way overcrowded. I think that mid stakes players would post more if there was a seperate forum. This would provide small stakes players with more opportunities to learn by reading and reviewing mid stakes threads.
|
|
#8
11-30-2005, 10:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
Would be very nice IMO.
|
|
#9
11-30-2005, 12:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
[ QUOTE ]
Does anybody else here think it would be nice to have a midlimit forum for 1/2 to 3/6 or so? [/ QUOTE ] Yes. But the most important thing is that we get a split. This forum is getting really crowded, and good posts get lost soon.
|
|
#10
11-30-2005, 12:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Splitting the PL/NL Forums
my selfish answer (i'm playing .5/1 right now) is that they should be kept together. the stt forum has everyone posting with a subject line like "($55) TPTK etc" so you can see immediately what the buy-in is, which i think would be good regardless of what happens with splitting.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
