#1
|
|||
|
|||
65 suited vs. LAG, my line
Hi All,
Playing 6 handed. LAG in MP limped, folded to me in the SB. I had 65s (clubs). I completed and the BB checked. Flop came ragged with 962 rainbow (included 9 of clubs). On the flop LAG bet, I called, and the BB folded Turn was 10c. LAG bet, I raised, he called. Anyone like the raise here? River was a 6, he checked, I bet, he called. He had A2o. Thoughts, or all right? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65 suited vs. LAG, my line
i dunno that I raise the turn. were you planning to check the river behind if you didnt improve? what if he donked a river blank?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65 suited vs. LAG, my line
I would have lead the flop.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65 suited vs. LAG, my line
I would have either raised the flop or called again on the turn. The flop raise would help get HU, which happened anyway, and set up a possible free card if you wanted. Call, call is also an option with the BB out of the way letting the LAG keep on with his bluff. Also, he might 3 bet here and with a good draw and possible best hand I like taking the card off for 1 bet.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65 suited vs. LAG, my line
I pretty much invariably CR any flop I'm going to play when I'm defending my blind. What rationale is there to lead the flop instead?
EDIT: Mea culpa, I didn't notice this was multi-way. When I say I pretty mcuh always CR, I meant headsup blind defense. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65 suited vs. LAG, my line
I prefer raising the flop to make sure it gets heads up and set me for a cheapish showdown.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 65 suited vs. LAG, my line
We don't need the results. I am also confused with the action. Arn't you first to act in the small blind? How is he checking before you act?
|
|
|