#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20k hands of 100$ NL - ptracker stats
[ QUOTE ]
Off hand, I'd start by looking at the play from the SB and BB. [/ QUOTE ] Why? I'd say the blinds are fine. Especially the SB. The guy is losing less than 1/4 of his blind per hand. I'd say that's good, particularly when you consider he is OOP every hand. Everybody loses from the blinds, but what are good stats? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20k hands of 100$ NL - ptracker stats
[ QUOTE ]
loosen up a bit / open raise more with position play more post flop and use position and aggresion to advantage post more hands [/ QUOTE ] Also, you should only be losing money from SB and BB in the long run. Seems like you are playing too tight overall, but are not adjusting for position, so still playing weak hands up front. You need to loosten up overall, this means in LATE POSITION. I can't stress that enough. Open-raise a lot also from later position. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20k hands of 100$ NL - ptracker stats
Thanks for all the help guys. I really appreciate it.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20k hands of 100$ NL - ptracker stats
You're also massively aggressive on the flop, but less so on other streets. I would recommend slowing down on the flop - maybe you always throw a continuation bet out there, bet any unclaimed flop or almost always check raise from the blinds? Granted, I have a smaller sample size, but I'm actually less aggressive on the flop than I am on the turn/river.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20k hands of 100$ NL - ptracker stats
[ QUOTE ]
You're also massively aggressive on the flop, but less so on other streets. I would recommend slowing down on the flop - maybe you always throw a continuation bet out there, bet any unclaimed flop or almost always check raise from the blinds? Granted, I have a smaller sample size, but I'm actually less aggressive on the flop than I am on the turn/river. [/ QUOTE ] his aggro#'s are good |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20k hands of 100$ NL - ptracker stats
Looks great for a ten-handed game.
You aggression numbers are good, your vpip is fine if you don't want to play into many marginal situations postflop. I'd say experiment with playing some tricky hands (SCs, S1-3GS) from LP for a raise. Also, how many tables are you playing out of curiosity? Posting hands is better tho. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20k hands of 100$ NL - ptracker stats
4 tabling the whole way. I started out with 2 tables for my first 5 minutes at 100 NL and then put 4 up and never looked back.
I've created a new alias and I will try to loosen up some. I think I still play my AK and QQ like crap and need to work on that also. Thanks again for all the help. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20k hands of 100$ NL - ptracker stats
5.54 on the flop is verging on overaggressive - this might be becasue he selects passive tables but it is high
that said a PTBB/100 of almost 6 is fine... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20k hands of 100$ NL - ptracker stats
Went to showdown 15.22 stands out to me. Maybe folding when you are getting odds to draw out or not considering implied odds?
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20k hands of 100$ NL - ptracker stats
he's playing aggressively and then makes people fold
hence the low WTS i think passive players have a higher WTS |
|
|