|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Ultimate Bet | |||
| Unfavorable |
   
|
38 | 25.00% |
| No Opinion / Neutral / Don't Know |
  
|
39 | 25.66% |
| Favorable |
  
|
75 | 49.34% |
| Voters: 152. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
07-25-2005, 05:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
Forget what's in style. What looks better on most women?
|
|
#2
07-25-2005, 05:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
Low cut, I want to see the belly button and the stomach. Wouldn't pants at the belly button be uncomfortable for the women anyways?
|
|
#4
07-25-2005, 06:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
High waist pants completely ruin a hot chicks ass.
St. Elmos Fire was on tv today and it made me thank god that girls dress how they do nowadays (slutty). It is a great time to be young(ish).
|
|
#6
07-25-2005, 06:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
The people who voted high waist are simply kidding.
I hope.
|
|
#7
07-25-2005, 09:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
Hey Rick, for future reference, you're talking the difference between high and low rise pants. And pants that sit on the natural waist (i.e. slightly below the belly button) are high rise pants.
Also, the reading comprehension is unsurprisingly low on OOT. "Most women" dooders.
|
|
#8
07-25-2005, 09:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
The people who voted high waist are simply kidding. I hope. [/ QUOTE ] or they are stuck in the 80s.
|
|
#9
07-25-2005, 09:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
It's not the high-waistedness or low-waistedness of the jeans that I have issues with. It's that most of the low-waisted jeans are very oddly cut and very unflattering. The put those weird gigantic pockets on them too that cover the bottom half of the ass and are down on the legs. If they would just do a better job of making them both low-waisted and cutting them to be more flattering, I'd be happy.....that and issue citations to fat girls caught wearing them.
|
|
#10
07-25-2005, 10:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
It's not the high-waistedness or low-waistedness of the jeans that I have issues with. It's that most of the low-waisted jeans are very oddly cut and very unflattering. The put those weird gigantic pockets on them too that cover the bottom half of the ass and are down on the legs. If they would just do a better job of making them both low-waisted and cutting them to be more flattering, I'd be happy.....that and issue citations to fat girls caught wearing them. [/ QUOTE ] Also, unless a chick has a real bubble butt, a lot of low-waist pants make a chicks ass look boxey- as if their back simply morphs into their legs.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
