If you had to choose on rakeback models?

[beanie]

Which option is most preferrable. Pick one.

[StacysMom]

If u dont get screwed in 4 months, its +EV to affiliate.

[beanie]

Speaking as someone who would seemingly benefit greatly from this type of scenario, it is still a great unknown and the known is by far the preferrable option.

what color is the sky in your world?

[StellarWind]

[ QUOTE ]
If u dont get screwed in 4 months, its +EV to affiliate.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think OP is assuming that if your affiliate screws you then you can never get RB for that site again.

We'd all vote for the 25% if being screwed meant losing a month's pay and then quickly making a new deal.

[beanie]

I am not so sure of that. I think a lot of people are saying they would like to be done with the hassle.

[DocMartin]

I think the only reason to pick the first option would be if the 2nd one wasnt available. Or you were just lazy and not really concerned about making as much money as you could.

[beanie]

I definitely don't think you can rule out people going for certainty. They trust these sites, that is likely the reason they would take less. Better service, in theory.

Imagine if the percentages were equal. That is not inconcievable.

[somapopper]

Since you have to blatantly violate the T&C's of party to open a new account, I don't really feel like biting the hand that feeds me. I also think that there is a non-zero chance that Party will go so far as to close accounts and permanently ban folks who violate their T&C's in this fashion. Would it be a good business decision? Probably not, but that doesn't mean they won't make it.

[TemetNosce]

[ QUOTE ]
I think the only reason to pick the first option would be if the 2nd one wasnt available. Or you were just risk averse .

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP