Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2005, 01:30 AM
Go_Blue88 Go_Blue88 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 361
Default Descartes wax discussion in his Meditations

Hey guys,

I'm currently writing a paper about the possible purposes of Descartes' wax discussion in his Meditations. So far, my primary argument is that he uses it to show the epistemological narrator that sense perception has no purpose whatsoever. Also, I'll probably mention how this functions as an awful personal identity argument.

But, I was wondering if any of you had any opinions on this matter? I certainly wouldn't take your ideas, I have my own. I'm just curious as to what others think.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2005, 02:18 AM
theweatherman theweatherman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: Descartes wax discussion in his Meditations

The wax argument goes to show how the senses are easily fooled to think that the wax is different when the mind clearlyknows that it is the same. It is important to show how the mind is the ultimate power of the body, not the senses.

I'm not sur ewhat you mean by claiming that it is an awful personal identity argument, but i think that it shows that the mental reasoning powers of the mind are infinitly more important than the seneses.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2005, 02:44 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Descartes wax discussion in his Meditations

Here's the info:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/de...-epistemology/

You win the paper
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.