Is this dreadful? 44 on Party 3/6

[kidcolin]

You say that about 44, but a lot of players will raise 66 in that spot in a heartbeat, even though connectors like 87 still has solid equity against you.

It has to be based on reads. 3-betting gives you the advantage of making players make bad folds against you (i.e. not peeling with QTs or calling down with 77 on an A high flop). If he sucks postflop and folds too much, it could be worth it. If you just thought "he's probably stealing, raise!!" then it's a bad move.

[Stealthy]

[ QUOTE ]
You say that about 44, but a lot of players will raise 66 in that spot in a heartbeat, even though connectors like 87 still has solid equity against you.

It has to be based on reads. 3-betting gives you the advantage of making players make bad folds against you (i.e. not peeling with QTs or calling down with 77 on an A high flop). If he sucks postflop and folds too much, it could be worth it. If you just thought "he's probably stealing, raise!!" then it's a bad move.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that there is a place for re-raising mid-low pairs but if I am doing this then I want control of the hand and want to take that control on the flop. If I cannot get it then I would rather fold then see an expensive showdown where I am probably staring at a decent made hand.