|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should dtbog keep making polls? | |||
| No, OOT is stupid |
   
|
14 | 14.43% |
| No, polls are stupid |
  
|
7 | 7.22% |
| No, dtbog is stupid |
  
|
30 | 30.93% |
| Yes, I like the replies of people flaming him and each other |
  
|
29 | 29.90% |
| Yes, I enjoy the informative insight into OOT |
  
|
17 | 17.53% |
| Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
11-22-2005, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Iraq Reality Check
I think Hans Blix saying "Um...yeah. We really can't find [censored] here" put me in the less than 30% category.
And no, having WMD's doesn't justify invasion. Using WMD's justifies invasion. 
|
|
#4
11-22-2005, 11:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Iraq Reality Check
[ QUOTE ]
Though mixed, there is a slight bias towards believing weapons we're there. Also, there is almost no difference between questions 2 and 3, proving WMDs were completely irrelevent to the war. [/ QUOTE ] Hardly irrelevant to the war. Irrelevant to your question. We know the Bushies were lying. If they had accidentally been proven right, that would not have made them truth tellers. It would have made them fortunate liars.
|
|
#7
11-22-2005, 11:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Iraq Reality Check
[ QUOTE ]
No, irrelevent to the war. If the existence of WMDs was not the reason we went to war (as evidenced by poll) then why are we there? [/ QUOTE ] -1: Assumes this poll is an accurate reflection on pre-war rationale. It's amazing the cognitive dissonance 2,000 dead and a "long" 2.5 year war can cause. YFI.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
