|
|
#11
04-19-2005, 11:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bubble hand - disconnected player
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, I'd call with AJ here if I were big stack, because I'd call with AJ if this were 3 way, and this hand is essentially a 3 way hand. I hope you're able to see this. If you're the big stack, you have to call with AJ here. If you don't, it's a leak. [/ QUOTE ] As the big stack I would probably call with AJs, but to say this situation is the same as 3-way is absurd. 
|
|
#12
04-19-2005, 12:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bubble hand - disconnected player
[ QUOTE ]
As the big stack I would probably call with AJs, but to say this situation is the same as 3-way is absurd. [/ QUOTE ] From the big stack's point of view? How is that absurd?
|
|
#14
04-19-2005, 12:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bubble hand - disconnected player
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] As the big stack I would probably call with AJs, but to say this situation is the same as 3-way is absurd. [/ QUOTE ] From the big stack's point of view? How is that absurd? [/ QUOTE ] Because with the micro-stack around the play of the other players changes dramatically. If this was a true 3-handed pot, your calling standards should be considerably lower.
|
|
#15
04-19-2005, 01:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bubble hand - disconnected player
[ QUOTE ]
Because with the micro-stack around the play of the other players changes dramatically. If this was a true 3-handed pot, your calling standards should be considerably lower. [/ QUOTE ] I think we're arguing semantics.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
