teh ultimate stop'n'go guru advice thread

[ChuckNorris]

These stop'n'go threads are making me sick [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
It's SO easy to decide when to stop'n'go. It really is! Just ask yourself a few questions.

1) Should I just fold?
If not, on to question 2.

2) Are the stacks deep enough for any other raise preflop or bet on the flop than all-in to be reasonable?
If not, on to question 3.

3) Would pushinh preflop have any fold equity?
If not, on to question 4.

4) Am I closing the action preflop or is it irrelevant for the players acting after me whether I raise or call (like when you're SB and the original raise >= BB's stack)?

If yes, it's certainly the time for a stop'n'go, especially if you are opening the action on the flop. And even if you aren't the chance that villain misses the flop and check/folds is probably bigger than the chance that opponent calls preflop when (clearly) committed.


There are probably better guides for stop'n'gos somewhere if you just search for em... But this is how my thought process guess when I play. Probably made some silly errors there, feel free to correct me if so.

edit... I gave it a cooler topic so you won't just mistake it for another boring argument over a basic to-stop'n'go-or-not hand history post. And then I edited it another time, thanks for showing it.

[tech]

[ QUOTE ]
3) Is the opponent(s) committed to calling my preflop all-in?
If not, on to question 4.


[/ QUOTE ]

I don't get this one. If you have FE preflop, just push. The stop-and-go is used to create postflop FE when you have none preflop (at least that is how I primarily use it).

[ChuckNorris]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

3) Is the opponent(s) committed to calling my preflop all-in?
If not, on to question 4.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't get this one. If you have FE preflop, just push. The stop-and-go is used to create postflop FE when you have none preflop (at least that is how I primarily use it).

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that is what I meant of course. TYVM for pointing it out. I was 100% certain I couldn't make a post with that many parts without saying the exact opposite to what I mean somewhere.

What is really sad, however, is that some people seem to really think that that's what the stop'n'go is for.

[fluorescenthippo]

good post. i need to be doing more stop and gos. ususally im too lazy/forget and end up pushing preflop.

[Myst]

[ QUOTE ]
What is really sad, however, is that some people seem to really think that that's what the stop'n'go is for.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why is that a sad thing? Doesnt that work to your advantage as a player? Lets face it. Poker is a game where you are working in DIRECT competition with everyone else at your table. So why would you want your opponents to have one more tool in their arsenal to beat you?

[ChuckNorris]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

What is really sad, however, is that some people seem to really think that that's what the stop'n'go is for.


[/ QUOTE ]
Why is that a sad thing? Doesnt that work to your advantage as a player? Lets face it. Poker is a game where you are working in DIRECT competition with everyone else at your table. So why would you want your opponents to have one more tool in their arsenal to beat you?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I thought about it when posting that. It's great that people at my tables make mistakes, obviously. But peoples' stupidity is still always sad too. Even if it's lucrative and funny.

[MegaBet]

sigh...if only it was that easy...

That's the beauty of poker, so many situations. It's usually best not to overuse a stop'n'go and just trust your instincts.

[tigerite]

Indeed. It's also best not to stop-and-go with strong hands like AK, because you don't want them to fold. The chance of you dominating them is too high. It should be only with marginal hands, and even those you think might be slightly behind (or even very behind in the case of small pp to big pp) but you can knock them off their hand on a high-card flop

[ChuckNorris]

In response to Megabet and tigerite:

The use of stop'n'go, when it should be used, is usually pretty much unquestionably the best play, and can easily be proven so.

[ QUOTE ]
Indeed. It's also best not to stop-and-go with strong hands like AK, because you don't want them to fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nothing personal, but this is just so awfully wrong that it hurts. Come on, you "agree" with Megabet's "poker is beautiful cuz there are so many situations" message with a blanket statement that doesn't even apply into most situations.

Say you're heads up against an opponent with 250/500 blinds and stacks of 4000 for the both of you. The opponent, now in small blind, has raised every hand to 4BB. So they raise to T2000 again. You know for a fact that they will call your possible reraise with any two, as they should, since they're getting 3:1 odds for the call. You hold AK, so you decide to push because it's so cool to be such a leet dominator, even though you know there's a possibility for the opponent to fold to stop'n'go, since you did it with a crappier hand earlier in an identical situation.

AK against a random hand is a 65% favorite. By pushing preflop, knowing that they will call, you win

0,65 * 8000 - 4000 = 1200

chips on average, if we treat your BB as part of your stack just to make the numbers neater.

Now, if you reckon that the villain will fold x% of the time to a stop'n'go, you win 100% - x% of the time the previously calculated sum, and x% of the time you steal villains 2000 chips uncontested. Thus, you win

1-x * 1200 + x * 2000

chips on average. It's easy to see that if villain folds to the stop'n'go at any time, it's profitable, and if they never fold, it's no worse than pushing preflop. The bigger x is, the more stop'n'go pwns over pushing preflop.

Ok, now you can complain how my example sucks because villain is pushing air and AK is so great because it has the possibility to dominate Ax and Kx. Let's say villain pushes top 30%, and calls the reraise preflop every time.

AK against Ax, K5, Q9, JT, 22 (30,4%) is again a 65% favorite. AK against the unrealistic range of Ax, Kx, 22 is only a 67% favorite. (Numbers courtesy of Poker Calculator.) I won't bother redoing the numbers with AK being a +2% fave.

If you still have doubts and think that I especially planned some kind of an unrealistic or especially rare example to prove my point, you can easily calculate other situations like this.

If my math is incorrect, please point that out too.

I think I should actually thank you guys for forcing me to do this! TY [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

edit... lol, while typing this there came out two or three other anti-stop'n'go-activists' responses... I think I'd better go to bed now. Chew on this example, and be welcome to give me others to show how much it sucks to do stop'n'go with AK. And yeah, I do understand that you obviously don't want to do a stop'n'go with AA everytime you would do it with 32o.

[ QUOTE ]
In response to Megabet and tigerite:

The use of stop'n'go, when it should be used, is usually pretty much unquestionably the best play, and can easily be proven so.

[ QUOTE ]
Indeed. It's also best not to stop-and-go with strong hands like AK, because you don't want them to fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nothing personal, but this is just so awfully wrong that it hurts. Come on, you "agree" with Megabet's "poker is beautiful cuz there are so many situations" message with a blanket statement that doesn't even apply into most situations.

Say you're heads up against an opponent with 250/500 blinds and stacks of 4000 for the both of you. The opponent, now in small blind, has raised every hand to 4BB. So they raise to T2000 again. You know for a fact that they will call your possible reraise with any two, as they should, since they're getting 3:1 odds for the call. You hold AK, so you decide to push because it's so cool to be such a leet dominator, even though you know there's a possibility for the opponent to fold to stop'n'go, since you did it with a crappier hand earlier in an identical situation.

AK against a random hand is a 65% favorite. By pushing preflop, knowing that they will call, you win

0,65 * 8000 - 4000 = 1200

chips on average, if we treat your BB as part of your stack just to make the numbers neater.

Now, if you reckon that the villain will fold x% of the time to a stop'n'go, you win 100% - x% of the time the previously calculated sum, and x% of the time you steal villains 2000 chips uncontested. Thus, you win

1-x * 1200 + x * 2000

chips on average. It's easy to see that if villain folds to the stop'n'go at any time, it's profitable, and if they never fold, it's no worse than pushing preflop. The bigger x is, the more stop'n'go pwns over pushing preflop.

Ok, now you can complain how my example sucks because villain is pushing air and AK is so great because it has the possibility to dominate Ax and Kx. Let's say villain pushes top 30%, and calls the reraise preflop every time.

AK against Ax, K5, Q9, JT, 22 (30,4%) is again a 65% favorite. AK against the unrealistic range of Ax, Kx, 22 is only a 67% favorite. (Numbers courtesy of Poker Calculator.) I won't bother redoing the numbers with AK being a +2% fave.

If you still have doubts and think that I especially planned some kind of an unrealistic or especially rare example to prove my point, you can easily calculate other situations like this.

If my math is incorrect, please point that out too.

I think I should actually thank you guys for forcing me to do this! TY [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Beat me to it.