9Ts w/ 2:1

[Exitonly]

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t3000 (8 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font>

Button (t72520)
SB (t36445)
BB (t13089)
UTG (t25007)
UTG+1 (t69312)
<font color="#C00000">Hero (t72759)</font>
MP2 (t27620)
<font color="#C00000">CO (t33750)</font>

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t10000</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to t33600</font>, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Hero calls t23600.

Flop: (t68100) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

Turn: (t68100) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

River: (t68100) K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

Final Pot: t68100

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
Hero has 9c Tc (straight, king high).
CO has Kh Ac (three of a kind, kings).
Outcome: Hero wins t68100. </font>







2:1 too good to pass up here?

[FakeKramer]

Nice flop. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

I dunno. I think it's a bit boarderline. Though with your big-stack and self-confidence it shifts from boardline to "callable... but barely".

I mean, if you knew you were live, then yea it's a good call. You fold though if you have a read on this guy that tells you he's probably got JJ-AA, right?

That's just my two cents.

[benneh]

easy call. thats my fav hand and does very well (relatively) vs high pairs and isn't that bad against overcards.

[TomHimself]

I dont think its an easy call, would be nice to see some calculations done for it

[TomHimself]

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 34.6081 % 34.24% 00.37% { T9s }
Hand 2: 65.3919 % 65.02% 00.37% { 55+ }


im sure there is a way of factoring in pot odds but im a pokerstove noob

edit- i was being quite generous with putting 55+ originally had 88+ and your equity was around 26%

[Exitonly]

Little poker stove confirms it's a close call...

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

726,016,896 games 1.234 secs 588,344,324 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 35.6041 % 35.31% 00.29% { T9s }
Hand 2: 64.3959 % 64.10% 00.29% { 77+, AJs+, KQs, AJo+, KQo }

Vs that range, i'm getting better than the 2:1 that the pot is offering me.... (64/36 compared to ~2.2/1


and i figured, if i lose, i just shift to super aggressive which is always funn, and if i win then i'm chipleader...

[benneh]

those odds figure to be almost exactly 2 to 1.

you're actually getting slightly better than 2to1 (like 2.1 to 1) and you're not even a 2 to 1 dog. I guess it's a personal choice whether you want to gambool here, but I take this every time.

[benneh]

[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 34.6081 % 34.24% 00.37% { T9s }
Hand 2: 65.3919 % 65.02% 00.37% { 55+ }


im sure there is a way of factoring in pot odds but im a pokerstove noob

edit- i was being quite generous with putting 55+ originally had 88+ and your equity was around 26%

[/ QUOTE ]

slight problem with your calculation is it doesn't include unpaired hands.

[TomHimself]

yea i know, i suck at pokerstove
edit- when i try and plug in unpaired hands it clears them when i hit evaluate. suggestions?