Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-19-2005, 09:56 PM
ChoicestHops ChoicestHops is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 341
Default Is the Northwoods Document real?

For those of you that have never read it:

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/

If it is, how come no one talks about it?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-19-2005, 10:03 PM
Arnfinn Madsen Arnfinn Madsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 449
Default Re: Is the Northwoods Document real?

If you go through these National Security Archives, you find lots of similar papers on different countries at different times involving some manipulation/propaganda issue, so why would this on be so special?

Around 2034, I think all Bush-supporters get a small shock.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-19-2005, 10:27 PM
HtotheNootch HtotheNootch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 151
Default Re: Is the Northwoods Document real?

[ QUOTE ]
For those of you that have never read it:

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/

If it is, how come no one talks about it?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's real, it's been talked about, but brushed under the rug big time.

If you really want to it to get interesting, check out more on Lemnitzer.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-19-2005, 10:29 PM
ChoicestHops ChoicestHops is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 341
Default Re: Is the Northwoods Document real?

Ive read about the Maine, and other possible cases like this. But this is the only one where Ive read an actual document.

It seems if anything a college clase would talk about this. Or a professor?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-20-2005, 10:41 AM
BonJoviJones BonJoviJones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 87
Default Re: Is the Northwoods Document real?

I assume most people don't talk about it because it didn't happen. It is probably in a countries best intrest for the military planners to look at things from just about every angle, even dangerous/awful ones.

This allows them to produce a complete picture for the national security policy makers (president/JCS/NSC/congress to some extent). Working from the 'anything goes' angle lets them keep options on the table longer into the policy making procedure.

Thinking about doing something terrible and doing something terrible are entirely distinct. Or do we like thoughtcrime now?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-20-2005, 11:53 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Madsen

What are suggesting? I hope it is not what i think, you must be Micheal Moore.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-20-2005, 11:59 AM
Arnfinn Madsen Arnfinn Madsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 449
Default Re: Madsen

[ QUOTE ]
What are suggesting? I hope it is not what i think, you must be Micheal Moore.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, not any supercorrupt scandal. Just a wake-up call when they realize the reasons for his actions was otherwise than he stated.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-20-2005, 12:01 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Madsen

$$$$$$$$$$
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.