Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2005, 04:15 PM
ChrisMonkeymaker ChrisMonkeymaker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Zzyzx
Posts: 24
Default Poker Essays (Malmuth)

In Poker Essays, Mason Malmuth had some estimates about bankroll requirements (BR) and hourly expectation (HE) for various games. Comparing 10-20 limit for a "good" player, he wrote:

Limit holdem. BR = 4900, HE = 20
Stud. BR = 3200, HE = 20
8 or better. BR = 1500, HE = 25

Looks like 8 or Better is far and away the best deal. A "good" player can make 20% more than both holdem and stud. And he can do it with half the bankroll of stud and a third tha bankroll of holdem.

Has anyone here had enough hours multitabling both holdem and 8 or better? Do you agree with Mason's estimates? I believe this book was written in the early 90s so he may have been off.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2005, 04:37 PM
phish phish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 47
Default Re: Poker Essays (Malmuth)

Yes, played correctly against weak competition, stud hi/lo has the lowest variance, followed by omaha hi/lo, holdem, then stud.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-15-2005, 04:55 PM
cpk cpk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 137
Default Re: Poker Essays (Malmuth)

I get the feeling, though I am not sure, that you will have much better luck finding a soft, fun 10-20 Hold Em game than a soft, fun 10-20 8 or better game.

The other problem is that good players tend to sap an 8 or better game dry in a hurry (both Omaha and 7CS). This "consumption" rate tends to make it harder to keep these sorts of games going in places other than extremely large markets such as LA or LV.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2005, 12:02 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poker Essays (Malmuth)

[ QUOTE ]
I get the feeling, though I am not sure, that you will have much better luck finding a soft, fun 10-20 Hold Em game than a soft, fun 10-20 8 or better game.

The other problem is that good players tend to sap an 8 or better game dry in a hurry (both Omaha and 7CS). This "consumption" rate tends to make it harder to keep these sorts of games going in places other than extremely large markets such as LA or LV.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is correct. It is very difficult to find good stud games.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2005, 12:07 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poker Essays (Malmuth)

i've been considering leaving hold'em to play O8B as my mainstay, because, I play it light years better than i play hold'em. so yes, O8B is great, but if you play live it's hard to find.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2005, 02:02 AM
paperchamp paperchamp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 39
Default Re: Poker Essays (Malmuth)

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, played correctly against weak competition,

[/ QUOTE ]

Herein lies the problem.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2005, 12:08 PM
ChrisMonkeymaker ChrisMonkeymaker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Zzyzx
Posts: 24
Default Re: Poker Essays (Malmuth)

What's the best pokersite at which one can at least four-table 8 or better? Do you know?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2005, 08:46 PM
Rootabager Rootabager is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lexington KY
Posts: 59
Default Re: Poker Essays (Malmuth)

PARTY
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.