Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09-2004, 08:27 PM
Lmn55d Lmn55d is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Default Step 5 Hand versus GIGABET

Hey I posted this in MTT too...not sure where it should go, but would like to get your opinions as well.

This hand was played in step 5 of party step tourney (2table). Blinds going up to 50/100 next hand. Villain is gigabet. Table is 6 handed, about 11-12 left in tourney. From my read, Gig is a very aggressive player who would make this raise with a wide range of hands. I thought that he'd fold a lot of the hands that would be close to a coinflip considering he was only getting 1.4:1 and because I had played very tightly, but I guess this last part of my read was wrong seeing that he called with JK. Was my push a good play?

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t50 (6 handed) converter

Hero (t820)
UTG (t1065)
MP (t1255)
CO (t2200)
Button (t2500)
SB (t475)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG folds, MP folds, CO folds, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises to t125</font>, SB folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t820 (All-In)</font>, Button calls t695.

Flop: (t1665) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

Turn: (t1665) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

River: (t1665) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: t1665

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
Hero has 9h As (high card, ace).
Button has Jh Kd (two pair, kings and jacks).
Outcome: Button wins t1665. </font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09-2004, 08:41 PM
The Yugoslavian The Yugoslavian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orange County
Posts: 130
Default Re: Step 5 Hand versus GIGABET

Hmm, interesting play by Gigabet. This move by him turns out to be slightly +CEV as he's 1.36 to 1 dog and getting over 1.4 to 1 odds. However, I too am surprised he called here with KJo. It could be that there were some meta-considerations that he took into account (given who else was at the table) since he plays against the same ppl in those STEP 5s like all day every day. This can't be a +$EV move given even a very loose range of hands by you. However, I do not regularly play such high stakes and defending your preflop raises may be too important. Frankly, there is a good chance he put you on a low pocket pair in which case he's only a 1.16 to 1 dog giving him a higher CEV.

Of course, him being a bot probably had something to do with it [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2004, 09:31 PM
KingMedicine KingMedicine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Francsico
Posts: 206
Default Re: Step 5 Hand versus GIGABET

[ QUOTE ]

Of course, him being a bot probably had something to do with it [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].

[/ QUOTE ]

gigabot
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-09-2004, 09:40 PM
Desdia72 Desdia72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 676
Default Re: Step 5 Hand versus GIGABET

[ QUOTE ]
Hey I posted this in MTT too...not sure where it should go, but would like to get your opinions as well.

This hand was played in step 5 of party step tourney (2table). Blinds going up to 50/100 next hand. Villain is gigabet. Table is 6 handed, about 11-12 left in tourney. From my read, Gig is a very aggressive player who would make this raise with a wide range of hands. I thought that he'd fold a lot of the hands that would be close to a coinflip considering he was only getting 1.4:1 and because I had played very tightly, but I guess this last part of my read was wrong seeing that he called with JK. Was my push a good play?

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t50 (6 handed) converter

Hero (t820)
UTG (t1065)
MP (t1255)
CO (t2200)
Button (t2500)
SB (t475)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG folds, MP folds, CO folds, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises to t125</font>, SB folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t820 (All-In)</font>, Button calls t695.

Flop: (t1665) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

Turn: (t1665) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

River: (t1665) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: t1665

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
Hero has 9h As (high card, ace).
Button has Jh Kd (two pair, kings and jacks).
Outcome: Button wins t1665. </font>

[/ QUOTE ]

very interesting. i'd like to hear his response.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-09-2004, 10:00 PM
DonkeyKong DonkeyKong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 274
Default Re: Step 5 Hand versus GIGABET

Marginal play by Gigabet. Not bad, not good. Guess he felt like gambling.

KJ only crappy vs the real premium hands and AJ/KQ. He probably thought you likely to make this play with any A or any pair given your stack.

This was kind of a Gus Hansen call -- making the marginal call to gather chips quickly and then run over the table...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-09-2004, 10:37 PM
Paragon Paragon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 42
Default Re: Step 5 Hand versus GIGABET

From my limited experience I'd agree here. The fact Gigabet is the big stack probably means he is far more willing to make marginal calls, since winning gives him a huge advantage over a shorthanded table, while losing is not disastrous. Also, I think showing his willingness to call the desperate shortstack allin steals only makes him a stronger table bully.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-09-2004, 11:04 PM
Gigabet Gigabet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 60
Default Re: Step 5 Hand versus GIGABET

look in multi table forum for response
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-10-2004, 12:16 AM
Apathy Apathy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 11
Default Re: Step 5 Hand versus GIGABET

Funny how everyone in the MTT forum attack Gigabets play as idiotic and here everyone defended it. In my opinion this forum gives much more thought out responses and consideration to posts, I think Gigabets call has a lot of merit and I am glad to see some in this forum actually consider it before just dismissing it as stupid as many in the MTT forum did.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2004, 05:00 AM
SuitedSixes SuitedSixes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 220
Default Re: Step 5 Hand versus GIGABET

I'll echo this sentiment . . . I think that this is the smartest of the non-theory/non-psyche forums. Lots of intelligent people willing to share advice. Let's hope it stays that way!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-10-2004, 01:13 AM
ethan ethan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 237
Default Re: Step 5 Hand versus GIGABET

[ QUOTE ]
look in multi table forum for response

[/ QUOTE ]

Here's a link to the thread in the MTT forum. The reasoning behind the call is worth a read, and I think it makes a lot of sense.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.