|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results:
After your flop checkraise, it was heads-up and he had position. Then he took two more bets from you. You could argue for a turn or river raise, but that could have easily folded a worse hand or been 3-bet by a better hand (namely QT).
On no street did he play as badly as you did preflop. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results:
AJ should have raised the river, no question about it! There are lots of hands besides QT that will bet like Scott.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results:
"AJ should have raised the river, no question about it!"
--From the safety of the 2+2 board, I'm pretty sure you're right. But since I wouldn't automatically do it in the heat of battle (call me weak-tight), I have trouble chastising the guy for just calling. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results:
Hell, if he had raised the turn, I would have 3-bet him!
I would not have raise him if he had raised preflop however. He missed a few bets here... -S |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results:
Where's the fun in 20/20 hindsigt if you can't mock people [img]/forums/images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results:
I had a tough time getting past the mere completion of the SB when there's only one limper in the hand, too. I would have raised to chase the BB and get it heads-up.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results:
I had a tough time getting past the mere completion of the SB when there's only one limper in the hand, too. I would have raised to chase the BB and get it heads-up.
really? I probably wouldn't have even played A9 here. Is this wrong? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
On no street did he play as badly as you did preflop. [/ QUOTE ]? |
|
|