#1
|
|||
|
|||
66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
Villian is 42/2,75/11 over 200 hands
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ Hero (6 max, 4 handed) converter Hero ($24.40) UTG ($27.15) Button ($12.09) SB ($80.89) Preflop: Hero is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.10. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Button calls $0.25, <font color="#CC3333">SB (poster) raises to $1.15</font>, Hero calls $1, Button folds. Flop: ($2.75) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> SB checks, Hero checks. Turn: ($2.75) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> SB checks, Hero checks. River: ($2.75) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $2</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to $8</font>, Hero calls $6. Final Pot: $18.75 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
no, i wouldn't call, i'd 3bet.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
What hands that c/r there that I 3 bet are calling that I beat?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
any 2 pair hand that includes the case 6 (which, from the looks of the rest of the hand, is a likely candidate for villain's holdings).
oh, SB raised preflop... well, theres still a good chance he's slowplaying AK or something. You're only beat by a better set here, so I still think a 3-bet has value. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
[ QUOTE ]
What hands that c/r there that I 3 bet are calling that I beat? [/ QUOTE ] A-high [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] It's likely villain thought you were trying to steal this little pot and is trying to snap off your bluff. I'd definately 3-bet this. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
[ QUOTE ]
no, i wouldn't call, i'd 3bet. [/ QUOTE ] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
Good thing I didnt, as villian had KK and MHING. Its stuff like this why I suck at 6 max.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
[ QUOTE ]
Good thing I didnt, as villian had KK and MHING. Its stuff like this why I suck at 6 max. [/ QUOTE ] eh.. moran slowplaying his kings.. 3betting will be the profitable play in the long run. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
[ QUOTE ]
Good thing I didnt, as villian had KK and MHING. Its stuff like this why I suck at 6 max. [/ QUOTE ] You're being out-come oriented. Villain played this hand very poorly. It would have been funny, in a sad sort of way, if he'd won only $2 with a set of kings. Personally, based on the way this played out, I'd have 3-bet all-in with this river, and the lost my stack. Then, after I finished swearing, I'd make a note on the fool and re-load. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
You definitely at least make this call. This particular Villian didn't start loosening up until he was over 100 bucks (I think I was sitting to your left at the table...buttom right)
|
|
|