OT: how times have changed

wiggs73 · #1 12-03-2005, 04:04 AM

here are some quotes i've found while surfing the archives, specifically the old FAQ. anyone who has been reading or posting in this forum for long should appreciate them...

"Some people play 2,3 or even 4 SnGs at a time. "

"To move up you should be confident that you are a winning player at your current level. You can achieve this through proving as much by showing a profit over 150 (some would say as much as 250) SnGs."

"What is a good ROI for SnGs? You need to play at least 200-300 at a given level to get a good read.

25% ok
25% - 35% good
35% - 40% very good
40% - 45% excellent
45% - 50% probably unsustainable"

#2 12-03-2005, 04:08 AM

Good post, hilarious [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img].

tigerite · #3 12-03-2005, 08:21 AM

25% "ok". ROFL always makes me laugh.

jeffraider · #4 12-03-2005, 02:43 PM

Wait, I need to play as many as 250 SNGs to prove I'm a winning player!?!?!

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

skipperbob · #5 12-03-2005, 02:50 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Wait, I need to play as many as 250 SNGs to prove I'm a winning player!?!?!

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

If I'da stopped @ 250 I woulda been a winning player; it was the next 5,000 that were the bitch [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

#6 12-03-2005, 03:11 PM

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Man,I wish I played sngs back then. I would be raptorlike prodigy playing *gasp* 4 tables, and playing sick amount of over 200 tournaments per month.

My ROI would suck though..

lacky · #7 12-03-2005, 03:37 PM

I dont coach, but I'd make an exception for you. But something tells me you wouldn't like the changes I'd make.