Quotation from "Small Stakes Hold'em"...

I just read "Small Stakes Hold'em" for the second time and I wonder about what is said in the beginning under "Why This Book..." Sklansky suggests "Making well over $50.000 per year playing $3-6 hold'em is now no big deal." This could be done "because you can play two or three games at once". Is this expactation realistic? It seems a little high to me. Is there any 2+2er who could confirm it's possible based on experience? Anyone else with ideas and thoughts about it please post your views about expectations at low limit hold'em.

sorry, belongs in the limit section

[aces_dad]

He's talking about LHE not NLHE (which you posted in NL forum) and I do recall a thread about this in one of the forums.

You may want to search the Books, as I recall either Ed Miller and/or David S. appear in the thread to comment on the accuracy of that statement. Basically they say they would revise the statement 'no big deal' to something like 'is quite doable' => meaning it's possible but not as easy as suggested with that quote.