Ginormous pots with KK - Page 2

Rudbaeck · #11 01-02-2005, 07:36 AM

Uh, no, two of the scare cards give us a redraw, and unless people go wild on the river we'll have to make a crying call.

But raising the flop accomplishes nothing.

Cardzy · #12 01-02-2005, 07:54 AM

Nobody said it was an auto-fold. I just went through this argument myself the other day and learned a lot from it. Check out this 4 page post where I had the same view as you.

James282 · #13 01-02-2005, 02:34 PM

Three-bet the turn in hand 1, for sure.
-James

asdf1234 · #14 01-02-2005, 04:06 PM

My hand is good both times. I definitely agree that the first one is an easy turn 3-bet. In the first hand, Nutjob had A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] for a turned flush draw, MP3 had JJ, SB had JT and BB had Qx.

UTG had Qx in the second one.

River2Pair · #15 01-02-2005, 04:16 PM

both are decent pots, but neither one is ginormous.

asdf1234 · #16 01-02-2005, 04:20 PM

Then again, ginormous isn't a word either.

Edit: well maybe it kind of is. It appears in various online dictionaries, although none provide strict BB guidelines for determining whether or not a pot is "ginormous."