Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-01-2005, 09:43 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: similiar to the \'paranoia\' post...

Ha ha ha. Look at the advice here:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...;gonew=1#UNREAD

And that is full ring, where opponents are less likely to semi-bluff raise.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-01-2005, 11:46 PM
Monty Cantsin Monty Cantsin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 61
Default Re: similiar to the \'paranoia\' post...

[ QUOTE ]

folding JJ cannot be a general policy here against unknown players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agree absolutely.

/mc
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-01-2005, 11:51 PM
Monty Cantsin Monty Cantsin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 61
Default Re: similiar to the \'paranoia\' post...

[ QUOTE ]

I looked up asymmetric risk preference, and all I got out of it is that losing $50 might distress someone more than winning $50 makes him happy. But as poker players, we shouldn't use this in our decisions, should we? EV is EV as long as we have the bankroll to back it up.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, asymmetric risk preference refers to the fact that people are more likely to take an unfavorable gamble when they start from a down position then they are to take a favorable gamble when they start from an up position.

It's a mistake that you want to profit from, not a mistake you want to make.

/mc
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.