Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-03-2005, 03:31 AM
dibbs dibbs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: east coast
Posts: 39
Default Re: Prahlad Friedman vs Jesus Ferguson

He thought they were chopping and Chris was just doing the annoying overbet in the obvious split pot position. He commented about this a while back to railbirds at prima.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-03-2005, 03:54 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Prahlad Friedman vs Jesus Ferguson

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Raising on that hand made little sense as he was unlikely to get paid off by a worse hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

QJ/JT or a medium/small pocket pair wont pay him off?

[/ QUOTE ]

are you serious? if jesus had qj/jt it woulda been a split pot, aces full of jacks.

and if jesus is betting the whole way on that board and friedman is calling don't you think jesus would atleast put him on a jack? only reason friedman thought the jack was no good is because jesus bet on the river after 2 calls. obviously friedman has a jack in that spot. so no, no person in their right mind would pay off aces full of jacks there.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-03-2005, 04:38 AM
IHateKeithSmart IHateKeithSmart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: check folding the nuts
Posts: 182
Default Re: Prahlad Friedman vs Jesus Ferguson

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Raising on that hand made little sense as he was unlikely to get paid off by a worse hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

QJ/JT or a medium/small pocket pair wont pay him off?

[/ QUOTE ]

are you serious? if jesus had qj/jt it woulda been a split pot, aces full of jacks.

and if jesus is betting the whole way on that board and friedman is calling don't you think jesus would atleast put him on a jack? only reason friedman thought the jack was no good is because jesus bet on the river after 2 calls. obviously friedman has a jack in that spot. so no, no person in their right mind would pay off aces full of jacks there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Friedman was holding KJ, so he made aces full of kings on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-03-2005, 04:52 AM
Rosie5 Rosie5 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24
Default Re: Prahlad Friedman vs Jesus Ferguson

did anyone else notice when jesus checked to see if the money was loaded with 1 dollar bills?

Jesus must be a 2+2'er
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-03-2005, 12:32 PM
Eegs Eegs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: eegspoker.blogspot.com
Posts: 310
Default Re: Prahlad Friedman vs Jesus Ferguson

Yea I thought Prahlad definitely lost the least amount he possibly could have with only one card in the deck able to beat him. Norman Chad was right when he said a lot of other players would go all-in on any one of those streets. That final board of A J A A K was so sick.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-03-2005, 12:58 PM
fireman664 fireman664 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 128
Default Re: Prahlad Friedman vs Jesus Ferguson

[ QUOTE ]
Raising on that hand made little sense as he was unlikely to get paid off by a worse hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

I really thought it looked like Jesus had a J (and they would chop), until the King hit on the river (giving Prahlad the 2nd nuts , with precisly 1 card that beats him) I personally would have raised, like I said putting Jesus on a J and seeing if he had commited himself to the hand.....of course I would have gone broke right then, but he's better than me.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-03-2005, 01:40 PM
DyessMan89 DyessMan89 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 308
Default Re: Prahlad Friedman vs Jesus Ferguson

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Raising on that hand made little sense as he was unlikely to get paid off by a worse hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

QJ/JT or a medium/small pocket pair wont pay him off?

[/ QUOTE ]

are you serious? if jesus had qj/jt it woulda been a split pot, aces full of jacks.

and if jesus is betting the whole way on that board and friedman is calling don't you think jesus would atleast put him on a jack? only reason friedman thought the jack was no good is because jesus bet on the river after 2 calls. obviously friedman has a jack in that spot. so no, no person in their right mind would pay off aces full of jacks there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Friedman was holding KJ, so he made aces full of kings on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-03-2005, 03:00 PM
paperboyNC paperboyNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 290
Default Re: Prahlad Friedman vs Jesus Ferguson

[ QUOTE ]
Yea I thought Prahlad definitely lost the least amount he possibly could have with only one card in the deck able to beat him. Norman Chad was right when he said a lot of other players would go all-in on any one of those streets. That final board of A J A A K was so sick.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought Prahlad was going to raise on the flop to get information. I think he could have saved himself money by raising there.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-03-2005, 03:25 PM
CaptSensible CaptSensible is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sherman Oaks, Ca. USA
Posts: 471
Default Re: Prahlad Friedman vs Jesus Ferguson

I thought it was amazing he didn't go all in. I definitely would have lost my shirt on that hand.

But what I also thought was interesting was the way Friedman played the next hand. I don't know what the blinds were but it seemed like he tilted. I don't remember the hand exactly but it was something like Q 4. I think he had about 300k of chips left.

If it were me. After that beat I probably would have gone outside, take a few deep breaths and re-group my thoughts to let go of the previous hand but that's just me.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-03-2005, 03:46 PM
detroitplayer detroitplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 440
Default Re: Prahlad Friedman vs Jesus Ferguson

If I were Jesus I may have went all-in there. Does Friedman expect Jesus to move in with the case ace instead of value betting? If he put Jesus on a J, then the river K would have given him the better hand.

The $300k river bet made Friedman think about Jesus holding the ace, but would an all-in have had the same effect?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.