150k hand checkup

[illunious]

link

[zuluking]

What are you still doing at .50/1?

Personally I think you could be a bit more aggressive pre-flop and get that up to 8 or higher.

Your VP$ISB is a bit low, shoot for 31-32%.

Your WONatSD numbers are SPECTACULAR!

See you at 1/2.....aren't you there yet, and what is your Party Poker screen name so I can avoid you?!?! (Thats a compliment btw)

[Entity]

Your sample size sucks.

Oh: raise more preflop, and play more hands for chrissakes. This is .5/1. You are missing many profitable situations playing that tight at this level, IMO. PFR of 6.4 seems way too low overall.

I'm sure you have your reasons for still playing at .5/1 (it is fun, after all). [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Rob

[Chris Daddy Cool]

why you're playing .50/1.00 is baffling to me. awesome bb/100, w@sd, but you are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too tight for this level.

[bisonbison]

Now that is a motherfucking sample.

[Shillx]

Welcome to the zoo we call small stakes...those are some kick-ass stats. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

Keep it up.

Brad

[fairness]

i thought the zoo was the internet forum

[k000k]

[ QUOTE ]
i thought the zoo was the internet forum

[/ QUOTE ]
Ya, rec.gambling.poker if I'm not mistaken.. If I am, well I've been misled for a long time..

[kiemo]

Unknowningly named by David Ross the Zoo typically referes to the Internet subforum here at 2+2

[btspider]

this settles some winrate discussions and he is pretty tight. 5-6 BB/100 may be sustainable if you toss in another 6 VPIP of profitable hands.

does someone want to calculate his confidence intervals?