Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2005, 04:45 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default A nano preflop decision

(Note: this post is primarily directed at the newer members of the forum, in an effort to spur a conversation about reads and table selection.)

So, I'm continuing a nano-limit 15BB challenge from yesterday. Having run through .02/.04 and .05/.10 in 53 hands, I stalled at .10/.20. Picked it up again today...sat down at this table and watched 3 hands before posting and getting the following:

PokerStars 0.10/0.20 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">UTG raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 3-bets</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="#666666">5 folds</font>, Hero ?

Reads: I haven't seen UTG do anything much. UTG+1 is short-stacked, and tilting at MP1 who's sucked out on him with crap a couple of hands in a row. UTG+1 capped the flop and turn last hand against 2 opponents with a really obvious gutshot.

Call, raise or fold, what do you do and why?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-23-2005, 04:49 PM
Vote4Pedro Vote4Pedro is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 8
Default Re: A nano preflop decision

I'd call

As long as you aren't reraising, I think either calling or folding is fine.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-23-2005, 04:52 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default Re: A nano preflop decision

[ QUOTE ]
I'd call

As long as you aren't reraising, I think either calling or folding is fine.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
(Note: this post is primarily directed at the newer members of the forum, in an effort to spur a conversation about reads and table selection.)

[/ QUOTE ]

You also forgot to give any sort of why...c'mon, Pedro, follow the rules, man.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-23-2005, 04:52 PM
Fryguy Fryguy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: A nano preflop decision

You're getting better than 4:1 right now, and will certainly be better than 4:1 after UTG completes. Pretty easy call here. I don't think you can raise with this much action out of position, and I think folding is giving up too much.

It sucks if UTG caps, but we are suited, and we are getting a discount. And MP2 is bad and will likely help bloat the pot if you make a big draw
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-23-2005, 04:58 PM
Vote4Pedro Vote4Pedro is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 8
Default Re: A nano preflop decision

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-23-2005, 05:07 PM
GTSamIAm GTSamIAm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 523
Default Re: A nano preflop decision

Is UTG a thinking player? If he is, he had to expect UTG+1 would do something crazy, so I would put his range of hands much stronger in that case.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-23-2005, 05:13 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default Re: A nano preflop decision

[ QUOTE ]
Is UTG a thinking player? If he is, he had to expect UTG+1 would do something crazy, so I would put his range of hands much stronger in that case.

[/ QUOTE ]

See the OP for my read on UTG. To that I'll add, how many thinking players do you see at .10/.20 and what does that make your "default" player?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-23-2005, 05:52 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A nano preflop decision

So if I read this right, UTG+1 is staking off, MP1 seems loose, and UTG hasn't done anything extraordinary one way or another but then again we haven't seen a lot of hands from him either.

I was going to say fold, but I think I'm leaning to call after running pokerstove. It's still churning but if we expect a cap, and put UTG on TT+, AQs+, AQo+, and assign random to both the UTG+1 and MP1, then if my math is correct we're getting around 4:1 not counting our bb which is a little over what pokerstove currently says our equity would be. It's close, and if it was my skill postflop I'd be more inclined to fold, but w/bozlax playing I'd call.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-23-2005, 05:54 PM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: A nano preflop decision

Pre-preflop decision [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]: Stop playing nanos [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]
Preflop decision: Probably call (call if it was a 3-bet cap preflop). You will get 5:1 if it isn't capped and you are roughly 5:1 to flop something good. Add in the times that you flop someone a little less good and you can probably call here (assuming you play well and they play not as well). If you knew a cap was coming, you would fold. If you are unsure it might be best to fold, but I would still call and play poker.

Edit - It depends how short UTG+1 is. Fold if he only has a few bets left and call if he has a decent but less then 12 bb amount.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-23-2005, 05:56 PM
GTSamIAm GTSamIAm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 523
Default Re: A nano preflop decision

Fold? I dunno, however you split it, preflop is a close decision.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.