How many BB/100 are people making at the 30/60? Similar to 15/30 #'s?

marathoner1977 · #1 05-11-2005, 02:42 PM

I'm ready for the jump from 15/30 to 30/60 now that all the tables are open. What have other people been experiencing with BB/100??? I am around 1.2BB/100 over 200K hands - will it be reasonable to shoot for the same figure?

Thanks!!

Jeff W · #2 05-11-2005, 02:53 PM

It's tough to tell now because the new tables will change the dynamics of the 30/60.

1800GAMBLER · #3 05-11-2005, 03:31 PM

I'm actually curious if there is more value in the 30/60.

bicyclekick · #4 05-11-2005, 04:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I'm actually curious if there is more value in the 30/60.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm with you on this one. The 15/30's MIGHT be more profitable, I dunno.

pfkaok · #5 05-11-2005, 06:47 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I'm actually curious if there is more value in the 30/60.

[/ QUOTE ]

are you starting from the assumption that 15/30 had more value than the 30/60 before this (b/c of wait lists)

If so, do you think that this is more of an increase of the value of 30/60 with extra tables, or decrease in the value of 15/30 now that a lot of the fish moved up? or just a fairly even mix of both?

ActionBob · #6 05-11-2005, 06:48 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I'm with you on this one. The 15/30's MIGHT be more profitable, I dunno.

[/ QUOTE ]

I haven't played all that much of the 30-60 so its just a guess, but I'd be pretty certain the 15-30's are more profitable. This is just an educated guess though, I really don't have enough data to go with on the 30-60 games.

-ActionBob

Dazarath · #7 05-11-2005, 07:34 PM

I would think the 30/60s would be more profitable now that all the new tables have opened up. Well, at least, once everything sort of settles down. At the moment, there may be a huge rush of fish/rocks towards the 30/60s just because of the new tables. Correct me if I'm misunderstanding something, but usually, higher limits are considered more profitable than lower limits right? Isn't that the reason people want to move from 2/4 to 3/6 as soon as they have the adequate bankroll and experience? I guess we should ignore the PP 5/10s and 10/20s. Because of the prescence of the 6-max tables, the full ring games are considered to be less fishy.

pfkaok · #8 05-11-2005, 07:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Correct me if I'm misunderstanding something, but usually, higher limits are considered more profitable than lower limits right? Isn't that the reason people want to move from 2/4 to 3/6 as soon as they have the adequate bankroll and experience?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, yeah, but it is very dependant on the skill level of the competition at those levels, as well as your own skill level.

for example, somebody winning only 1 BB/100 or less at 15/30 would probably be a loser at 30/60... just like somebody who's just scraping by at 3/6, would probably be a loser at 15/30. its pretty much the same idea as how when you add more tables, there's a certain point at which you start losing money. When you get to a certain level that's too tough for your skill, you won't earn more than you would at a lower level.

also, if you were earning the same amount at a lowever level, it would be better to play there since you would have the same earn with lesser swings. maybe not "better" in the sense that you'll want to play better competition to improve, but it would at least be statistically better, in terms of earn/Standard dev ratio.