Converting from LAG to TAG - Please critique my stats!!!!

[marathoner1977]

Here are 20K hands during my LAG approach to the 5/10 SH (4 tabling).

VPIP = 28
PFR = 13
ATTEMPT STEAL = 22
FOLD SB STEAL = 77
FOLD BB STEAL = 72
W$WSF = 36
WENT TO SD = 31
WON AT SD = 58
A-F = 3.0
A-T = 2.3
A-R = 1.8
Folded to river bet = 48


After making some changes - mostly due to suggestions made by others on 2+2. This only includes 2K hands, so I know that I am a long way from understanding what my "true" #'s will be.

VPIP = 22
PFR = 17
ATTEMPT STEAL = 33
FOLD SB STEAL = 80
FOLD BB STEAL = 70
W$WSF = 40
WENT TO SD = 40
WON AT SD = 61
A-F = 3.6
A-T = 1.3
A-R = 1.3
Folded to river bet = 44

I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE MORE HELP / SUGGESTIONS - TY!!!

[Scotch78]

[ QUOTE ]
WENT TO SD = 40
WON AT SD = 61

[/ QUOTE ]

You are running incredibly hot right now. I would hesitate to generalize from such a skewed sample.

Scott

[TStoneMBD]

scotch is right

defend your bb more.

[sthief09]

too passive on the big streets. not defending nearly enough

[mperich]

Defend BB a lot more. Flop aggro a bit high altho not horribly so, turn agg low, river aggro is ok altho some may say get it up.

In both samples you are folding to a river bet way too much, but if you were calling these bets your river aggro would be going down, and then it would be too low. This means you are probably not value betting enough, as well as not calling down enough. So the combination of doing both should keep your aggro where ti should be, and make you a not more money.

I wouldnt exactly call your old stats lag either. I just dont know what I would classify them as.

-Mike