Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Two Plus Two > Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2005, 09:34 PM
PairTheBoard PairTheBoard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 46
Default Re: Mason\'s Bunching Part II

[ QUOTE ]
Hi pair:

I didn't mention this in the article but you should probably consider the quality of folded hands. For instance, with an earlier position raiser, there are players who would fold a hand like queen-ten suited or unsuited but who would automatically play this in an unraised pot. That makes the odds of flopping a set of treys a little better than your calculation shows, so in my opinion 5-to-1 is a reasonable guess.

best wishes,
Mason

[/ QUOTE ]

If you conclude the remaining 3 nonblind players don't have a 3 because they Fold to the EP raise the odds drop to 5.2-1. Now you're concluding players can't have a 3 if they Call the EP raise And they can't have a 3 if they Fold to the EP raise. I think that's pressing it. And it still doesn't quite get the odds down to 5-1. I doubt the effect you suggest for the Folders is anywhere near that strong.

PairTheBoard
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2005, 10:24 PM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Mason\'s Bunching Part II

Hi Pair:

I have no qualms with your analysis.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.