Intentially Cutting Connection to go All In

[primetime32]

[ QUOTE ]
The Pokerroom network doesn't allow all-in protection on any of its no-limit tables. I mostly play there because of this, I just find it really annoying when people disconnect at other sites. It doesn't even happen that often, maybe once every other day or so, but it's enough to keep me going back to PR.

[/ QUOTE ]

First, the pokerroom network sucks.

second, it doesnt not happen every other day. It has been about 100,000 hands between someone pulling that crap with me.

third, the pokerroom networks sucks

fourt, party poker and other sites have specific tables that don't allow disconnect protect.

fifth, the pokerroom netowrk sucks.

[evil_twin]

I don't really agree that Pokerroom sucks. Certainly they're not awesome or anything like that and they have problems like all networks. Still not terrible though.

Perhaps I've just been unlucky, I found disconnections occuring far too often in all-in pots on Party. Surely the no-DP protect tables are avoided by the uber-fish?

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't really agree that Pokerroom sucks. Certainly they're not awesome or anything like that and they have problems like all networks. Still not terrible though.

Perhaps I've just been unlucky, I found disconnections occuring far too often in all-in pots on Party. Surely the no-DP protect tables are avoided by the uber-fish?

[/ QUOTE ]

The "uber-fish" don't cheat, they're too dumb. DP abusers are most likely either marginal winners or marginal losers. They have a clue (its how they figured out how to exploit the cheat in the first place), but they're just not good enough to win without cheating.

[primetime32]

I think the fish take the first table available. Personally i havent found a difference.

as for pokerroom, i have had so many problems with them and continue to do so while i finish clearing a bonus through eurobet. I obviously dont speak for everyone, but my experiences have been brutal.