Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Best video ever?
No 21 91.30%
Yes 2 8.70%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:01 PM
4_2_it 4_2_it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mayor of Simpleton
Posts: 403
Default SSNL Tourney Structure

I think a MTT structure works best. We can set up a table at Stars and have a $10+1. The only question is timing. Please vote below:
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:03 PM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: SSNL Tourney Structure

haha, I win!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:08 PM
tripp0807 tripp0807 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 69
Default Re: SSNL Tourney Structure

Like I said in the other thread, I thought we were talking about a heads-up tournament - not MTT.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:21 PM
4_2_it 4_2_it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mayor of Simpleton
Posts: 403
Default Re: SSNL Tourney Structure

Here's my reply from the other thread:

"HU tourneys take a lot of time and effort to organize. It will easier to try a MTT or two to get people excited. Also, with the holidays upon us, I can't see a HU tourney starting before the middle end of January anyway. We can have a MTT in early January. "
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:22 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 69
Default Re: SSNL Tourney Structure

Will we be able to make this a deep-stacked tourney? I believe stars has had regular deep-stacked MTTs in the past (occasionally). I think making this a regular stars tourney will be waste of time, since it will become a push fest and us SSNLers won't be able to show off our superior postflop skills. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:24 PM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: SSNL Tourney Structure

[ QUOTE ]
since it will become a push fest and us SSNLers won't be able to show off our superior postflop skills

[/ QUOTE ]

<<hoping for short stacks>> [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:28 PM
tripp0807 tripp0807 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 69
Default Re: SSNL Tourney Structure

None of you donkeys stand a chance against me.
















(There is insufficient trash talk as of right now)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:30 PM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: SSNL Tourney Structure

This tourney needs a name. SSNL MTT ain't gonna cut it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:35 PM
tripp0807 tripp0807 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 69
Default Re: SSNL Tourney Structure

[ QUOTE ]
This tourney needs a name. SSNL MTT ain't gonna cut it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Battle of the Insufficiently Funded Geniuses of Poker.

Tournament of Cheapions

WSSSOP

WCOOSSP
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:39 PM
EMcWilliams EMcWilliams is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Smithtown School of Business
Posts: 115
Default Re: SSNL Tourney Structure

I dont think were gonna beat Battle of the Insufficiently Funded Geniuses of Poker.

Deep stacked would be so much more fun and a better game overall. I dont have any stars, but I guess we can work something out
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.