|
|
#11
11-22-2005, 03:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Card Trackers or pure Stupidity
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to Gindo [ Qh Qs ] Gindo calls [15]. [/ QUOTE ] His flop call was idiotic and the guy got lucky to beat you but you played the hand horribly. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, you really mucked this one up badly. Sadly, suckouts will happen. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] 
|
|
#12
11-22-2005, 03:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Card Trackers or pure Stupidity
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to Gindo [ Qh Qs ] Gindo calls [15]. [/ QUOTE ] Am I the only one that caught this? You limped in with QQ, a very excellent hand but also very vulnerable to overcards. Do you really want people with A7o getting a chance to limp in with you, catch an ace on the flop and then break you? Was this a pathetic attempt at "slow playing" like you hear about on TV? You also have to bear in mind in online tournaments and SNG's morons are quick to call big bets and all'ins early on, so you will get paid off by raising initially. You then attempted to reraise hte mini raise (he miniraised to 30 and you reraise to 100, as best I read it). You have to look at how much money is on the table and what sort of odds you are giving people to chase. His flop call was idiotic and the guy got lucky to beat you but you played the hand horribly. [/ QUOTE ] he lrr...65 chips. weak.
|
|
#13
11-22-2005, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Card Trackers or pure Stupidity
you tell me. the guy was like a million to one underdog when he flopped NOTHING, and youre asking if he knew it was coming? im sorry that everyone is being so rude but sometimes its just so obvious that its not worth asking.
i suggest getting into stud. the developers (one of whom i know very closely. you can pm me for details) have not gotten around to developing card trackers for stud yet so that should be safe.
|
|
#15
11-22-2005, 07:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Card Trackers or pure Stupidity
[ QUOTE ]
He clearly has the new log10 pattern map. I didn't even know they we sufficiently accurate for use in sit n goes. [/ QUOTE ] They've been working on a tourney version for some time. There's even a wristwatch version for live play - Steve Dannenmann beta-tested it during the WSOP. Obviously it isn't perfect.
|
|
#17
11-22-2005, 07:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Card Trackers or pure Stupidity
The guys around here sure love a good joke...
Seriously...there is a piece of software (I won't name it here) that is used this way: you enter the hand# and it will decode it (like a barcode or a checksum) to determine what 5 cards will appear on the flop. This is also used by Party Support to determine if there was any hacking, etc. because they can just decode the number string to get the flop that was supposed to hit. The bad part is you cannot read opponents' hole cards or determine what order the cards will hit the flop...just the cards themselves. There is a known bug when using the "four color deck" option that will not correctly assign the right suit to a card, but the rank is the same. I really hate that software like this exsists...but if you are among the few people who use it then all the better. Be VERY CAREFUL trying to download it online or from another player, because there are often "backdoors" like viruses and utilities that let your "friend" see your hole cards. Best of luck, and hurry before Party changes their checksum algorithms after the 1st of the year...(although they will crack the new one too eventually!) -ZEN
|
|
#18
11-22-2005, 08:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Card Trackers or pure Stupidity
Dude, he flopped a pat ALL-RED flush! Of course he's calling your all-in.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
