Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-25-2005, 09:53 AM
syphlix syphlix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 266
Default Re: General Bankroll Question

[ QUOTE ]
Whats the difference between 30 buyins, or....
10 buyins, and if you bust, 10 more buyins, and if you bust that, 10 more buyins, and if you bust that, retirement?

We're talking about $55.00 here to reload...

[/ QUOTE ]

there is no difference.. i think it's just a mental bankroll...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-25-2005, 10:59 AM
Paul2432 Paul2432 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA USA
Posts: 374
Default Re: General Bankroll Question

[ QUOTE ]
If you never want to buy back into site, you need 50 buy ins.

[/ QUOTE ]

This statement is misleading. It should read:

If you want to have an X% chance of never having to buy back into a site you need 50 buy-ins.

If X is a big number (say 30%) then as little as 10 buy-ins is adequate (depends on ROI).

The standard formula for ROR is:

ROR = e ^ (-2 x BR x WR / SD^2)

Where,

e = base of natural log = ~2.718282
BR = BR in buy-ins
WR = ROI
SD = 1.8-1.9 for most players

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-25-2005, 11:13 AM
shejk shejk is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: General Bankroll Question

"Just a mental bankroll"...

If I played with a 10 buyin roll on site, I would change my play to a low variance itm-maximising strategy rather than the roi-focused one that I like to imagine myself using.

To make an attempt at answering the OP I'll ask some questions of my own:
*Are you confident that you are a winning player at the level in question? If not, of course you have to calculate with a bigger roll to give yourself time to adapt.

*Can you afford reloading if broke? If you can, then it's mostly about how your game might be influenced by the size of your roll. Will you get careless/too careful with a big/small roll?

*Are you planning to move down in limits if your bankroll decreases under your minimum bankroll? If yes, you can allow yourself a higher calculated risk of ruin since you will only play say half the downswing on the limit you started with.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-25-2005, 11:27 AM
vindikation vindikation is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 181
Default Re: General Bankroll Question

[ QUOTE ]
This makes you down 3 buy-ins.Not really a huge shock.

[/ QUOTE ]

It was more of a psychological shock to lose 8 buyins in a row (-$166). I never had that kind of financial swing before with the $10's and it kind of freaked me out. It's nothing really, like you mentioned, but psychologically I wasn't ready for it. That's why I want a $1000 bankroll to play the $20's (I'm at $925 now). I don't want to redeposit money again and if I fall down to $750, I'm going to start playing the $10's again until I get it back up to $1000.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-25-2005, 12:29 PM
pokerlaw pokerlaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 431
Default Re: General Bankroll Question

[ QUOTE ]
now i'm considering this question, I'm ready to move up as a multi player, I'm trying to decide whether or do 30,40,50 buyins...

[/ QUOTE ]

I recently started 3 tabling $5+.50s and deposited 300 to start (~50 buy ins). I just liked the way it looked. fortunetly, I was never below $300; and after my first 100 it is $590, so i think i will be going to the 10s after i increase my sample size to 500 (assuming i dont lose it all, lol).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.