Sngs at Stars tough as shark skin.

[Hendricks433]

Yeah sometimes you can practically fold into the money.

[jeffraider]

I can't believe people think that the Stars $27s and below are actually tough, honestly. This reminds me of the "Are the $5+1s getting tougher?" posts of six months ago.

[popimp3333]

I agree with most of the others here. The lower buy in at stars are a shoe in most of the time as long as you are patient enough for the donkeys to weed themselves out. Very easy money in the smaller stakes sngs!

[pooh74]

[ QUOTE ]
I agree with most of the others here. The lower buy in at stars are a shoe in most of the time as long as you are patient enough for the donkeys to weed themselves out. Very easy money in the smaller stakes sngs!

[/ QUOTE ]

you would literally have to 20 table the 5s or 10s to make it worth while...they take a long time

[AlphaWice]

I found that $35 6max sngs were more donkish than $5 and $10 sngs (esp. turbos.)

My roi in $5/$10 sngs have been about -10% in stars ($11 in empire i was making 12% before RB

My roi in $25/$35 sngs is about 9%

go figure

ps. dont trust these stats they are only over 800 sngs roughly

[The once and future king]

[ QUOTE ]
I can't believe people think that the Stars $27s and below are actually tough, honestly. This reminds me of the "Are the $5+1s getting tougher?" posts of six months ago.

[/ QUOTE ]

I cant believe you said this, after I said this:

[ QUOTE ]
You can confirm for all non Stars players reading this the Tramps piss phenomonenon. Also as you have a large sample size you will have noticed that for each 5000 sngs you play your penis shrinks 1mm.

[/ QUOTE ]

Having allready said this:

[ QUOTE ]
The games are tough tough tough as leather, roxs we are talking compressed carbon, tricky we are taliking Siegfried and Roy, tight we are talking gnats chuff and aggresive we are talking American foreign policy.

[/ QUOTE ]

It must be an an American thing to take someone literaly however big the sign they put out that they might not be being 100% serious.

[TruFloridaGator]

Small sample but here it is:

670
5.6% ROI
40.6% ITM

Dropped below 20% ROI after 150 games.
Dropped below 10% ROI after 450 games.
Steady decline since.

Glaring problem:
1st 68
2nd 101
3rd 103
4th 94

Struggling HU like many are and maybe over aggressive 3H. Getting a lot of spite calls people tired of my pushing from the bubble.

I continue to believe I am doing some good things, some bad, sending a lot of HH, having a number of people read them. A lot of variance too though.

Is my ITM number good enough or should that be higher as well? Should I go in to push any2 in SB theory HU?

[Maulik]

you should consider pokeroom.