Meta-Analysis Project: Help Wanted

[USCSigma1097]

Irie,

I'd be happy to help in whatever way possible but I 10 table, as I suspect that many other lower stakes SNG players do. Do you feel that ROI drop is statistically significant from 8 to 10 tabling as to not include that with your data pool?

Sigma

[Irieguy]

[ QUOTE ]
Irie,

I'd be happy to help in whatever way possible but I 10 table, as I suspect that many other lower stakes SNG players do. Do you feel that ROI drop is statistically significant from 8 to 10 tabling as to not include that with your data pool?

Sigma

[/ QUOTE ]

10+ tablers make up too small a percentage of SNG players.

Irieguy

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Irie,

I'd be happy to help in whatever way possible but I 10 table, as I suspect that many other lower stakes SNG players do. Do you feel that ROI drop is statistically significant from 8 to 10 tabling as to not include that with your data pool?

Sigma

[/ QUOTE ]

10+ tablers make up too small a percentage of SNG players.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

Why does this matter? They're still playing SnGs and there's no significant difference between how they play and how 8-tablers play.

Also, why aren't you taking as an input people's ROIs over their last 1000 before the switch? Don't you want to know the change in ROI?

[Irieguy]

[ QUOTE ]

Why does this matter? They're still playing SnGs and there's no significant difference between how they play and how 8-tablers play.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is totally untrue in my experience.

[ QUOTE ]


Also, why aren't you taking as an input people's ROIs over their last 1000 before the switch? Don't you want to know the change in ROI?

[/ QUOTE ]

There are lots of things I want to know.

The purpose of this analysis, however, will be to determine how much $/SNG a group of winning SNG players earn over a very large number of SNGs between Nov. 1 and Dec. 25.

It is best to keep the focus and scope of this thing very narrow, for a host of reasons.

Irieguy