Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-26-2005, 02:20 AM
tech tech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 74
Default Re: Current Major Leaguers that are locks for the Hall of Fame

[ QUOTE ]
Sosa is definitely in.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh he'll probably get in, but he doesn't deserve it. He had 4-5 years with big numbers, and he is a known cheater.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-26-2005, 02:28 AM
tech tech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 74
Default Re: Current Major Leaguers that are locks for the Hall of Fame

[ QUOTE ]
Which was the only good one?

[/ QUOTE ]

Honestly, I'm not impressed by any of them. Look at his stats year by year. Now explain the sudden "improvement" starting in 1998 and "coincidentally" tailing off after the corked bat incident.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-26-2005, 02:30 AM
[censored] [censored] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,940
Default Re: Current Major Leaguers that are locks for the Hall of Fame

[ QUOTE ]
Look at his stats year by year. Now explain the sudden "improvement" starting in 1998 and "coincidentally" tailing off after the corked bat incident.

[/ QUOTE ]

He was cheating and exceled. He got caught, stopped cheating and his production dropped off accordingly.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-26-2005, 02:34 AM
Bulldog Bulldog is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 11
Default Re: Current Major Leaguers that are locks for the Hall of Fame

I'm not disagreeing. But you don't need to skew the facts to try to make a point. He had five ridiculous seasons. Innocent or guilty can be debated, but you can't say he had one good year.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-26-2005, 02:54 AM
KDawgCometh KDawgCometh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: spewin chips
Posts: 1,184
Default Re: Current Major Leaguers that are locks for the Hall of Fame

[ QUOTE ]




Quite a few close:
Rafael Palmeiro
Manny Ramirez
Todd Helton
Jeff Bagwell
Larry Walker
Bernie Williams
Vladimir Guerrero

[/ QUOTE ]

for the close guys:

Palmeiro-yes
Manny- some more good years
Helton- see above
Bagwell- might take a while, there can be an arguments for and against
Walker- I don't think he makes it, a cutoff guy
Bernie- no way
Vlad- needs more quality seasons
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-26-2005, 03:58 AM
bugstud bugstud is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 418
Default Re: Current Major Leaguers that are locks for the Hall of Fame

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Which was the only good one?

[/ QUOTE ]

Honestly, I'm not impressed by any of them. Look at his stats year by year. Now explain the sudden "improvement" starting in 1998 and "coincidentally" tailing off after the corked bat incident.

[/ QUOTE ]

him walking 30 more times starting in '98 and being born in Nov of 1968, meaning he's not exactly a spring chicken anymore. Is it weird he had his burst a little later than most? Sure. Entirely 'roids based? I doubt it. In '95 he started showing the discipline and in the injury-plagued '96 he improved is isolated slugging, had an off year, then put it all together.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-26-2005, 04:03 AM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not the gay jack
Posts: 2,275
Default Re: Current Major Leaguers that are locks for the Hall of Fame

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Which was the only good one?

[/ QUOTE ]

Honestly, I'm not impressed by any of them. Look at his stats year by year. Now explain the sudden "improvement" starting in 1998 and "coincidentally" tailing off after the corked bat incident.

[/ QUOTE ]

What part of steroids dramatically improves your walk rate again? Oh wait, that was Sammy Sosa and Jeff Pentland completely changing his approach to the plate.

Look at a guy like Alfonso Soriano - what's his big knock? He can't lay off bad pitches, so he doesn't walk a lot, and he strikes out a good bit on horrible swings. The guy has all the tools and can hit the ball a very long way. Now just imagine if he started taking those pitches, and other bad ones. Don't you think he'd become a much better hitter?

I agree that he'd be a marginal case in the eyes of voters if he didn't hit all the homers (but made up for it by, say, hitting a lot of doubles). But his peak was so monstrous that I'd put him in - it's the Koufax argument.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.