#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopping bottom two-pair when defending against a LAG...
I was referring to postflop, not even thinking about the PF call.
Against the right player, I don't mind the call. I'm not so sure this is the right player, since you'll probably run into problems trying to steal this pot when you miss. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopping bottom two-pair when defending against a LAG...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] what about bet/3-betting the turn? [/ QUOTE ] Once you're raised on the turn, I don't think you're ahead 66% of the time, so you can't 3-bet for value. So checkraising the turn is the same as betting and then checkraising the river except when he has KJ, KK, QQ type hands and an A falls on the river you frequently miss 2 bets. [/ QUOTE ] yeah i agree, but you really think he has JJ that often when he raises the turn? [/ QUOTE ] I don't know. I don't get raised on this turn very often by one pair, maybe not. Also consider he could have 66. But these hands are unlikely (in terms of the number of combinations of them) compared to big jacks or overpairs when we bet turn, and some players do just get very aggro in blind steal situations. So I don't know, maybe not. But the thing about missing 2 bets on the river when it's an A still applies. Although I suppose you just bet it. So it's one bet you miss, 3/46ths of the time. So it all depends on how much he raises the turn with a worse hand, I don't know what the average amount is at 3/6 but I'd guess it's not that high. [/ QUOTE ] i totally get what you're saying. i've only played short handed 1/2 and 2/4 and i would get raised by AA/KK/QQ/AJ here a decent amount of time in blind steal situations (plus this guy has a pretty decent AF), but this is full ring 3/6 and perhaps you're right about the turn raise. i agree that with a better read of the opponent we could optimize the play, and that against someone about whom all we know is that he's x/x/x, the postflop line in this hand appears to be best. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopping bottom two-pair when defending against a LAG...
I like your line here. The turn c/r slows him down quite a bit. At first I was inclined to believe you could get more out of him with a bet/3bet, but since he is fairly aggressive facing a turn cap would suck.
Regardless of turn play I like your river line as well. Nice hand. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopping bottom two-pair when defending against a LAG...
I prefer a fold preflop, this is not a good hand to defend with. Post-flop is perfect.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopping bottom two-pair when defending against a LAG...
One thing I wish is that I had a better sense of which hands to defend with.
I do defend with a hand like 6 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] sometimes, largely because suited one-gappers are among the hands HPFAP recommends defending with, versus an aggressive stealer. However, most Party 3/6 players don't steal as aggressively as the opponent described in the short-handed section of HPFAP. (So maybe it's fortunate for me that low/medium suited connectors make up such a small percentage of the hands we're dealt.) Anyway, I agree with the consensus that postflop looks good in this hand. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
For those who don\'t like the preflop call...
HEFAP recommends defending in the BB, against aggressive opponents, with hands such as any "...straight flush combination with no gaps or just one gap (except for 42s and 32s)." [pg. 187].
Does the fact that this was a openraise from the CO really turn this from a call to a fold? Or would people be folding this hand even to a button raise despite the advice from S&M? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Results...
Opponent folded to my river bet...suggesting that either he overplayed AK on the flop, or he made a super amazing laydown with an overpair.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
You don\'t have to defend as much playing 3/6
Because of the blind structure in 3/6, you don't have to defend your blinds as liberally as you would playing 2/4 or 4/8. Since there is less money in the pot, you can tighten up on the hands that you'll defend and steal with. In a normal 2: 1 structure defending with 64s is borderline at best. Playing 15/30 with a 3: 2 blind structure I think you can justify a call. Playing 3/6 with a 3: 1 blind structure makes this an easy fold.
Just my opinion... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopping bottom two-pair when defending against a LAG...
[ QUOTE ]
As I struggle to get to break-even in 3/6 after approx 15K hands, . . . [/ QUOTE ] Chess, I have no doubt you are a winner in this game although your results might not show it yet. Break-even (or, ugh, losing stretches) can go quite a while, as you know. As for the hand, you should fold pre-flop but the rest of the hand looks about perfect! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] |
|
|