#1
|
|||
|
|||
hold\'em better with 4 card board?
because i've been getting hammered on the river lately, i'm beginning to think hold'em would be better without a river.
what say you? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hold\'em better with 4 card board?
draws would get worse
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hold\'em better with 4 card board?
[ QUOTE ]
draws would get worse [/ QUOTE ] i think that's what he wants. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hold\'em better with 4 card board?
[ QUOTE ]
because i've been getting hammered on the river lately, i'm beginning to think hold'em would be better without a river. what say you? [/ QUOTE ] Two-Card Guts is a fun game. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hold\'em better with 4 card board?
i think holdem where you must use both cards would be interesting
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hold\'em better with 4 card board?
If you removed the river it would only be a matter of time until you started whining about how the turn needs to be removed. [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hold\'em better with 4 card board?
Hijack, but HE would be really great if the river was an individually dealt downcard.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hold\'em better with 4 card board?
River Down Hold'em, although HE would be REALLY great if you could bet the pot to get a sixth upcard.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hold\'em better with 4 card board?
[ QUOTE ]
River Down Hold'em, although HE would be REALLY great if you could bet the pot to get a sixth upcard. [/ QUOTE ] If by "bet the pot" you mean pay money dead into the pot equal to it, and it would be optional after, betting has ended, that would be awesome. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hold\'em better with 4 card board?
[ QUOTE ]
i think holdem where you must use both cards would be interesting [/ QUOTE ] best idea in this thread |
|
|