quote from Walter Sinnott Armstrong-atheist

[Jeff V]

The book "God? A Debate Beyween A Christian And An Atheist"
PP 83

"My arguments will not be proofs in the mathematical sense. I don’t see how there can be any absolutely conclusive proof about God, that He exists, or doesn’t. There is not much, if anything, of any importance that one can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt. So I won’t even try to give a conclusive proof. What I will give is adequate proof against the existence of God."

Doesn't this argument go against the request for "proof" requested by many atheists regardig the existance of God?