|
|
#71
11-09-2005, 10:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
Of course if you're talking in terms of bankroll, the variance is going to increase as a function of how many hands you play. [/ QUOTE ] gold. seriously, how is this still a conversation? Barron 
|
|
#72
11-09-2005, 11:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Of course if you're talking in terms of bankroll, the variance is going to increase as a function of how many hands you play. [/ QUOTE ] gold. seriously, how is this still a conversation? Barron [/ QUOTE ] Because no one mentioned the central limit theorem yet? Haven't taken any stats in a while, but I'm pretty sure that provides the definitive answer.
|
|
#73
11-09-2005, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Of course if you're talking in terms of bankroll, the variance is going to increase as a function of how many hands you play. [/ QUOTE ] gold. seriously, how is this still a conversation? Barron [/ QUOTE ] because nasty posted something that didnt make sense, unless he was talking about the variance of his bankroll? and because it seems to be a source of common confusion?
|
|
#75
11-09-2005, 12:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
Of course if you're talking in terms of bankroll, the variance is going to increase as a function of how many hands you play. [/ QUOTE ] you're an MITer, right?
|
|
#76
11-09-2005, 12:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Of course if you're talking in terms of bankroll, the variance is going to increase as a function of how many hands you play. [/ QUOTE ] you're an MITer, right? [/ QUOTE ] You havent heard the "Variance is directionally proportional to number of hands played" law, derived by Phil Hellmuth. If you play 1 hand, you can only get 2 outed once..if you play 10, u can get 2 outed 10 times.
|
|
#77
11-09-2005, 01:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Of course if you're talking in terms of bankroll, the variance is going to increase as a function of how many hands you play. [/ QUOTE ] you're an MITer, right? [/ QUOTE ] Just because you couldn't hack it, doesn't mean you have to be a hater.
|
|
#78
11-09-2005, 01:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Of course if you're talking in terms of bankroll, the variance is going to increase as a function of how many hands you play. [/ QUOTE ] you're an MITer, right? [/ QUOTE ] You havent heard the "Variance is directionally proportional to number of hands played" law, derived by Phil Hellmuth. If you play 1 hand, you can only get 2 outed once..if you play 10, u can get 2 outed 10 times. [/ QUOTE ] Question for you: if you add two independent normal distributions, what is the variance of the result?
|
|
#79
11-09-2005, 01:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
Question for you: if you add two independent normal distributions, what is the variance of the result? [/ QUOTE ] There's nothing normal about these distributions. ;-) (I threw in the ;-) so the literalists wouldn't have a hissy fit.)
|
|
#80
11-09-2005, 01:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
how does 10 tabling reduce variance?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
