Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-11-2005, 05:04 PM
bobman0330 bobman0330 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: expert play or lapse in judgement?

I don't have my copy with me, but I think this play is discussed in HE4AP, possibly under slowplaying. The goal is to mimic a big hand, maybe a set of 4s that was afraid of check-raising and facing the field with 2 cold. You need the other players to fold, but they hopefully will on this flop. I think the play continues by leading out on the turn. I'll check my copy when I get home, or someone else can.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-11-2005, 05:08 PM
elindauer elindauer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 292
Default Re: expert play or lapse in judgement?

lapse in judgment. A raise looks clearly better than a call to me.

If you are trying to setup a big bluff on the turn, then ok, every once in a while perhaps it's not terrible. I like the straightforward raise to isolate because you have the best hand or fold because you don't.

-eric
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-11-2005, 06:56 PM
Schneids Schneids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 1,084
Default Re: expert play or lapse in judgement?

Is Erik123 the SB? This looks like something that Erik does a lot of.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-11-2005, 08:04 PM
SA125 SA125 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 171
Default Re: expert play or lapse in judgement?

Trying to determine whether or not this play is expert is trying to take the forum analysis of poker hands to new levels. It's impossible.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-11-2005, 08:46 PM
NYplayer NYplayer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 54
Default My thoughts

This was a 10 handed 100/200 game and the 'expert' is a known 2+2er who has sat with over 100K on the table and seems to be a winning player. his numbers are something like 18/13/2.3
He clearly froze up on the flop. He didn't have the courage to bet out and then failed to fold which was the best option when it comes back to him bet having players to act after him or check raise which is second best. This may have been a result of multi-tabling and just auto checking the flop when he didn't hit his set multi-way.

I believe it is clear that the proper play here given that he called pre flop is to lead out on the flop with a bet.

I think this flop play is a pretty bad mistake and i was very surprised to see it. I've seen him go overboard with action on the turn but that can be explained away by shania. However, as someone mentioned we all play our C game from time to time.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-11-2005, 08:54 PM
hellite hellite is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 94
Default Re: expert play or lapse in judgement?

[ QUOTE ]
expert is in is SB with 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].

UTG calls, a tough player raises, expert calls and big blind calls.

Flop: 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

Expert checks, BB checks, UTG checks, tough player bets, expert calls...

is this call an expert play or lapse in judgement?

[/ QUOTE ]

Misplayed preflop, misplayed flop...unless you open fold here I think you misplayed the turn. HU is whole different story, but against a tough player with people yet to act this is a sucker play. Playing this from the small blind is retarded. Big time leak. I'm not trying to be rude - although I do try that sometimes - but this is simple stuff. I gues the only question after the preflop error should be "Do I lead this flop?" Check calling not an option.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-12-2005, 01:02 AM
roy_miami roy_miami is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 104
Default Re: My thoughts

[ QUOTE ]
I believe it is clear that the proper play here given that he called pre flop is to lead out on the flop with a bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why is leading the flop better than checkraising?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-12-2005, 01:12 AM
goofball goofball is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 43
Default Re: expert play or lapse in judgement?

[ QUOTE ]
It could be a good play if he made it to check-raise the turn to make the tough guy fold, knowing that the chance the tough guy would fold is hight enough to make the play worth it.

Soh

[/ QUOTE ]

Tough players aren't usually just folding like girls to the turn checkraise.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-12-2005, 02:10 AM
tomahawk tomahawk is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: expert play or lapse in judgement?

[ QUOTE ]
folding >> raising >>>>>>>>> calling here, IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd usually agree, but in high, aggressive games I think the right play is often to call this with stuff like 55 or a 9, and raise it up if you have AK or a set or even a flush draw.

It depends on whether or not your opponents respect you or not though. If they don't then I like raising or folding this better.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-12-2005, 02:22 AM
phish phish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 47
Default Re: expert play or lapse in judgement?

I disagree with you all who think that this has been horribly played.
First, the pre-flop call is a no-brainer. He's small blind with two players already in, maybe three if BB calls. He certainly has the odds to try to hit a set. Small pairs are much more playable than most people realize since they are easy to play post-flop.
And the call on the flop isn't all that bad either. One, the raiser will bet even with a hand like AQ. His 55 may be best. And if it is AND his opponent(s) make a mistake of checking the turn, he may be able to win the pot. add to that the small chance he may hit a set on the turn. Given the $ already in the pot, it is not at all unreasonable to throw in one more small bet just in case.
The only reasonable argument against that call is that there are two players behind him to act. This would push the flop call to -EV, but I don't think by much.

In fact, I would argue that if you automatically play contrary to this all the time (auto-folding SB in this situation or auto folding on the flop without thinking thru the possibilities), you are giving up significant profit potential (though it will help to reduce your variance).

(and it seems to me that the best high limit players don't shy away from the high-variance but profitable (even if marginally so) plays.)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.