Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Poker > Omaha High
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-07-2005, 03:30 AM
Acesover8s Acesover8s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Michigan, GR
Posts: 998
Default A very typical hand being a true demonstration of implied odds in PLO

Everyone involved has 100x stacks.

1/2 the table limps to me, I raise almost the full pot out of the BB with 89JQ w/ spades. 2 callers, and the button raises the full pot. I call, and 1 of the limpers calls.

Flop is QQ5 with 2 diamonds. It goes check, bet, push, call, discuss.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-07-2005, 06:46 AM
mshalen mshalen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 107
Default Re: A very typical hand being a true demonstration of implied odds in

First let me make sure I understand who did what. After the flop you checked, the limper bet and then the button (limp then re-raiser) pushed.

The only thing that scares me is the limper- he could have anything. The button - given the limp then re-raise before the flop and the push now - probably has AAxxds. I can't imagine the button would have bet in that manner with 55xx maybe with AA55ds but then I feel like I looking for monsters under the bed.

Sorry about this post it is Sunday morning at 6am and I am a little foggy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-07-2005, 09:00 PM
webmonarch webmonarch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 61
Default Re: A very typical hand being a true demonstration of implied odds in

FWIW, I have found in my limited time in Omaha that anything less than stone cold nuts or some appropriate odds call is not worht a push.

In this case, I think you're almost certainly behind in one of two ways. Your villain has the other Q, or he flopped the 555, or maybe some crazy stuff like Q5.

OR, and probably more likely here, is that he's on the diamond draw (maybe with a Q), and he thinks he has the appropriate odds. The pot is pretty big when the push happens, but it probably isn't big enough for a flush draw, if I did my math correctly.

Will we see the results?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-2005, 02:09 AM
Huskiez Huskiez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 230
Default Re: A very typical hand being a true demonstration of implied odds in

My take is that you put button on AAxx. Limper could have a queen, but easily could not. It's unlikely button has a Q, and a paired flop is usually good for AA.

Button therefore pushed because he felt he had gotten enough in preflop that he is pot committed to this flop. Even if you are outkicked, you have some nut outs by filling up. Thus you called.

That's my reasoning behind this action.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-2005, 03:14 AM
RickyG RickyG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 151
Default Re: A very typical hand being a true demonstration of implied odds in

[ QUOTE ]
It goes check, bet, push, call, discuss.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is very confusing...Please try to post hands more clearly in the future.

If it went, Limper checks, you bet, Button Pushes, Limper Calls... Without any player specific reads i think button has AA and is overplaying, and limper has QXXX, but you have outs, and in a three way push your 9 outs should be enough ti call as you are putting in less than a third of the pot. with a PE of around 36% (if your outs are clean).

If the limper folded and you called, I think you played correctly.

my 0.02.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.