|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **Official Stars 100K added**
Adanthar, that seems like a strange reason for passing up a tournament with negative rake.
The tournament is effectively $553-23 rather than $500+30. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **Official Stars 100K added**
Not enough overlay/too much time investment when there's sixteen other tournaments today with the same or better numbers that pay out properly.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **Official Stars 100K added**
16? Either you're exaggerating or i'm waaaay out of the loop...
Party 350k, Stars +100k, what other major tournaments are there today? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **Official Stars 100K added**
Bodog, FT, Paradise, Absolute, Pokerroom, etc. etc. all have relatively big tourneys with overlays today
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **Official Stars 100K added**
I don't quite understand how the prize structure makes it a waste of time.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **Official Stars 100K added**
to compare Party is paying $375 to 400th place, and $4000 to 19th place, for a tournamnet with 250k less in the prizepool
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **Official Stars 100K added**
T3670 Break #1
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **Official Stars 100K added**
3195 at first break. My table had a few super-loose donkeys but I didn't get nearly as many of their chips as I hoped. Ah well.
Table 200. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **Official Stars 100K added**
[ QUOTE ]
to compare Party is paying $375 to 400th place, and $4000 to 19th place, for a tournamnet with 250k less in the prizepool [/ QUOTE ] So what? I still don't understand how that makes this bad. The reduction in variance from a flatter payout structure has it's advantages. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: **Official Stars 100K added**
Better players are going to have higher finish distributions than other players.. so this is basically taking money from the better players.
I don't think it's enouogh to counter the 100k overlay though. this is similar to the problem players have with the 20% payouts. |
|
|