Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-06-2005, 10:34 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: 400NL: I\'m seriously confused here.

[ QUOTE ]
Why didnt you bet ($35-$40) on the turn? Then I would fold to any raise.

Cheaper than check-raising [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].


[/ QUOTE ]

Not if you check raise to 26 [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-06-2005, 10:36 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: 400NL: I\'m seriously confused here.

This is a big hand, approximately 97.55% of the time.

There is a 2.45% margin of error incorporated into my estimation.

AQ is beat.
I prefer check/call flop and lead turn (folding a raise).
30-40 is good to lead the turn with.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-06-2005, 12:25 PM
swarm swarm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 178
Default Re: 400NL: I\'m seriously confused here.

I've seen this alot lately, villans underbetting into the agressor when they hit a set or two pair and are hoping to get raised. Your re-raise was really weak, why not make it 50 on the turn and fold to a raise?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.